Comment by satvikpendem
Comment by satvikpendem 18 hours ago
I guess database as a service is not as bullet proof of a business model as one thinks, same sort of acquisition happened with Neon.
Comment by satvikpendem 18 hours ago
I guess database as a service is not as bullet proof of a business model as one thinks, same sort of acquisition happened with Neon.
I mean sorta? It's value add over something like Aurora or RDS has been it's SDL and EdgeQL layer which makes it a hard pill to swallow not knowing if it's going to go under and you're stuck trying to maintain that yourself or migrate off of it.
I think the problem is it's too risky to utilise a "new" database today that isn't available as a managed option on many platforms.
Neon is just Postgres for the most part -- sure if they shut down it'd be a pain to migrate but you'd mostly be fine just swapping to AWS RDS/Aurora or the plethora of other Postgres providers.
Buying into things like Gel or now defunct RethinkDB mean if the primary company went under you're stuck with a dead DB engine and potentially no managed hosting options.