Comment by turnsout

Comment by turnsout 15 hours ago

3 replies

Absolutely. I don't understand why investors are excited about getting into a negative-margin commodity. It makes zero sense.

I was an OpenAI fan from GPT 3 to 4, but then Claude pulled ahead. Now Gemini is great as well, especially at analyzing long documents or entire codebases. I use a combination of all three (OpenAI, Anthropic & Google) with absolutely zero loyalty.

I think the AGI true believers see it as a winner-takes-all market as soon as someone hits the magical AGI threshold, but I'm not convinced. It sounds like the nuclear lobby's claims that they would make electricity "too cheap to meter."

0xbadcafebee 15 hours ago

It's the same reason for investing in every net-loss high-valuation tech startup of the past decade. They're hoping they'll magically turn into Google, Apple, Netflix, or some other wealthy tech company. But they forget that Google owns the ad market, Apple owns the high-end/lifestyle computer market, and Netflix owns tv/movie habit analytics.

Investors in AI just don't realize AI is a commodity. The AI companies' lies aren't helping (we will not reach AGI in our lifetimes). The bubble will burst if investors figure this out before they successfully pivot (and they're trying damn hard to pivot).

BryanLegend 12 hours ago

Helping to prevent a possible skynet scenario probably makes those checks easier to write.

There's a lot more than money at stake.

turtletontine 13 hours ago

> I don't understand why investors are excited about getting into a negative-margin commodity. It makes zero sense.

Long term, yes. But Wall Street does not think long term. Short or medium term, you just need to cash out to the next sucker in line before the bubble pops, and there are fortunes to be made!