Comment by limagnolia Comment by limagnolia 18 hours ago 2 replies Copy Link View on Hacker News I think you are looking at the code license, not the model license.
Copy Link Aloisius 16 hours ago Collapse Comment - No, it's the model license. There's a second license for the code.Of course, model weights almost certainly are not copyrightable so the license isn't enforceable anyway, at least in the US.The EU and the UK are a different matter since they have sui generis database rights which seemingly allows individuals to own /dev/random. Reply View | 1 reply Copy Link pabs3 6 hours ago Parent Collapse Comment - The output of a compiler is copyrightable, why aren't models similarly copyrightable? Reply View | 0 replies
Copy Link pabs3 6 hours ago Parent Collapse Comment - The output of a compiler is copyrightable, why aren't models similarly copyrightable? Reply View | 0 replies
No, it's the model license. There's a second license for the code.
Of course, model weights almost certainly are not copyrightable so the license isn't enforceable anyway, at least in the US.
The EU and the UK are a different matter since they have sui generis database rights which seemingly allows individuals to own /dev/random.