Comment by mapontosevenths

Comment by mapontosevenths 21 hours ago

6 replies

What do I get out of it using double the memory? It has zero new features that a normal human would want. There's supposed to be a benefit in a cost/benefit comparison or you just get a divide by zero error.

See my other comment in this thread for a list of the many, many, many ways Microsoft continues to chose not to improve.

[removed] 19 hours ago
[deleted]
vel0city 21 hours ago

There's a number of new features to the Windows desktop experience, I'm not really interested in reenumerating all of Microsoft's marketing here.

Personally I find the Windows 11 desktop experience far better than 10, despite it possibly using 1% more of my system memory at peak times.

And FWIW, on my Windows 11 desktop explorer.exe is using 110MB, not even 200MB.

  • mapontosevenths 18 hours ago

    > There's a number of new features to the Windows desktop experience, I'm not really interested in reenumerating all of Microsoft's marketing here.

    I was speaking specifically about the file explorer in this context, though you'd have to go back to the grandparent post at least to see that.

    • vel0city 17 hours ago

      You were speaking of explorer.exe's memory usage. That includes practically all the desktop experience. The right click menu, the desktop, the taskbar, the start menu, and more. Kill the process and see what all disappears. So no, you weren't speaking specifically about the file explorer, though it would take having some knowledge to understand that.

      • mapontosevenths 15 hours ago

        > So no, you weren't speaking specifically about the file explorer, though it would take having some knowledge to understand that.

        Don't blame me if the architecture stinks.

        The fact is it's unnecessarily large, complex, and wasteful of resources isn't the consumers fault. Deciding to use a single monolithic block of whack code that uses all my memory instead of separating those functions wasn't my choice and I'm not gonna change my expectations to suit that weird decision.

        • vel0city 15 hours ago

          You don't have any idea of what it actually is or what its actually doing but you're 100% certain its overly large, complex, and wasteful.

          Incredible.

          And as mentioned, on my other Win11 machines I couldn't get explorer.exe to use more than ~200MB, with most of its usage around 110-130MB. I think you've got something else going on there, potentially lots of other 3rd party applications hooked into it causing excessive memory usage. Win11 doesn't inherently use 500MB of memory compared to Win10 only using a bit under 200MB. That's something with your machines.