debugnik 20 hours ago

And I bet those green threads still need an IO type of some sort to encode anything non-pure, plus usually do-syntax. Comparing merely concurrent computations to I/O-async is just weird. In fact, I suspect that even those green threads already have a "colourful" type, although I can't check right now.

Reply View 2 replies
  • iviv 16 hours ago

    Pure actions can be run in parallel with https://hackage-content.haskell.org/package/parallel/docs/Co...

    Impure actions use the IO monad like always in Haskell: https://hackage.haskell.org/package/base-4.21.0.0/docs/Contr... (or the higher-level async library)

    I suppose an extreme version of the function coloring argument could be that all types are colors.

    Reply View 1 reply
    • debugnik 13 hours ago

      In a sense, kinda? The function colour problem is that you can't call an async API from a non-async caller without modifying the entire call chain (or blocking the full thread). In async/await languages the conflict comes from changing the return types; the syntax is orthogonal.

      Maybe in practice some properties of code are better off being whole-program than represented as types, even if they're less modular or harder to check.

      Also thanks for the reference, I haven't touched Haskell in ages; I'm more of an F# and OCaml guy.

      Reply View 0 replies