Comment by zeryx

Comment by zeryx a day ago

10 replies

I've only ever worked remote professionally and I've got a track record, when I apply to a new role there's no question that I can adapt to working remotely at X company.

If I just finished my PhD in comp sci and have never worked professionally in my life let alone remotely, going day 1 remote is a huge risk

Aurornis a day ago

I knew this was going to turn into a shoot the messenger (or downvote the messenger) situation.

Look, I also work remote and have for years. This is just the situation that’s happening out there. Having 5 years of remote experience no longer means as much because some companies let everyone work remote and waited until now to start firing and laying people off. We’ve hired some real duds into remote roles who had years of remote experience, apparently doing the same thing they tried to do with us: Work a couple hours a week or maybe collect paychecks from multiple jobs.

Every remote manager I know has stories like this. The remote world changed a lot since COVID and the rise of /r/overemployed and “Four Hour Workweek” junk has only made it worse for those of us who just want to work remote without shenanigans.

  • jacquesm 21 hours ago

    > We’ve hired some real duds into remote roles who had years of remote experience, apparently doing the same thing they tried to do with us: Work a couple hours a week or maybe collect paychecks from multiple jobs.

    Did you ever hire any duds when you were not hiring remote?

    > The remote world changed a lot since COVID and the rise of /r/overemployed and “Four Hour Workweek” junk has only made it worse for those of us who just want to work remote without shenanigans.

    A four hour work week is very normal in plenty of countries and in some there are common constructs built around even shorter work weeks.

    • matwood 21 hours ago

      > Did you ever hire any duds when you were not hiring remote?

      Bingo. I had an exec ask me once how will we know people are working if they are remote? I asked back, how do we know they are working now?

      Remote work is harder on management and leadership. It’s easy to see if someone is at their desk and seems friendly, it’s hard to really think about what value a person brings.

      • jacquesm 21 hours ago

        I've worked at a bank where one of the oft heard jokes was that 'I spend 8 hours per day there but I really wouldn't want to work there'. It was true too. 145 people in the IT department, and absolutely nothing got done.

        This was a bit of a let-down for me, all these people, so much fancy hardware. I had a hard time believing it at first. The whole place was basically caretakers that made the occasional report printing program and that based their careers on minor maintenance of decades old COBOL code that they would rather not touch at all.

        Something as trivial as a new printer being taken into production would turn into a three year project.

        On Friday afternoons the place was deserted. And right now I work 'from home' and so do all of my colleagues and I don't think there are any complaints about productivity. Sure, it takes discipline. But everything does, to larger or lesser degree and probably we are a-typical but for knowledge work in general WFH can work if the company stewards it properly. It's all about the people.

    • Aurornis 14 hours ago

      > Did you ever hire any duds when you were not hiring remote?

      Of course, but that's obviously a deflection.

      In person hires can't physically be in two offices at the same time.

      In person employees can't get a new in-person job and then not resign from their last job because they want to extract as many paychecks as they can before they get caught and fired.

      In person employees can't substitute in a hired interview taker for the interview and then hope nobody notices their voice sounds too different when they start the job.

      These are all real things that we've encountered with remote work (and more)

      Saying X can also happen in Y! Is a classic fallacious argument used by people who want you to think two things are equal, when in fact they can have very different probabilities and risk profiles.

      When I was working at a hybrid company we even had a few cases where people either couldn't focus at home (kids, family, distractions) or were insufferably combative in chat. Bringing them into the office solved it.

      The two environments are not equal, no matter how many times someone tries to deflect with "That problem can also happen in the office!"

      • jacquesm 14 hours ago

        I am not going to continue this conversation, I hope you understand.

    • AnimalMuppet 21 hours ago

      > Did you ever hire any duds when you were not hiring remote?

      That only worked a couple hours a week and collected multiple paychecks? Probably not.

      Sure, they hired duds. Just not that level of dud. And if they were, they found out much more quickly.

      • jacquesm 21 hours ago

        That doesn't happen remote either. Unless management is utterly incompetent, another variable a study like this should probably compensate for by increasing the sample size and pool diversity.