Comment by psychoslave

Comment by psychoslave a day ago

3 replies

People that can be taxed at several order of magnitude of wealth compared to a median income obviously didn’t work several degree of magnitude harder/longer/smarter. They more "efficiently" capture the benefits, certainly, but that’s it. And even there, mainly through network effect and pre-existing social forces.

If instead distribution of wealth was flatter in an equally wealthy society, a tax could still capture just as much.

When vladms speaks about high taxes on the rich, it already assumes the continuation of social structure which exaggerates the uneven distribution of wealth.

mlrtime a day ago

This is great in theory, but not practice and not practiced anywhere. You could site some EU countries with a very homogeneous population and a GDP < half of the states, but it's not convincing.

I don't think we currently have the most efficient tax vs productivity situation now, but I don't agree with equality being the goal.

  • psychoslave a day ago

    Obviously no argument can convince a party which say literally that proofs will be rejected, even those which might be provided on some concrete example. All the more when this party doesn’t align with the underlying praised values anyway.

    • [removed] a day ago
      [deleted]