Comment by philipallstar
Comment by philipallstar a day ago
IP is just the umbrella term for copyright/design/trademark/patent, isn't it?
Comment by philipallstar a day ago
IP is just the umbrella term for copyright/design/trademark/patent, isn't it?
My assertion is much weaker and therefore much easier to defend — even if you agree with copyright, patents, trademarks, and so on, it is not to out advantage as individuals to support grouping them into one umbrella term as it muddies the waters.
Trademark and service marks are a whole different ball game from copyright. To group them together confuses everyone and is therefore only beneficial for those who wish to fish in troubled waters.
It is. A common argument against using "intellectual property" is how beliefs about tangible property - land and objects - shouldn't be applied to copyright, patent, etc., so using the term is an implicit acceptance of a false narrative.