codedokode a day ago

To be fair, Linux has always been like this, breaking things with updates. Linux was ahead of commercial companies, but they caught up with it.

  • OJFord a day ago

    Linux works with updates however you want it to - e.g. Arch is a 'rolling release' distro, so compatibility is always expected at the latest of all packages; any update to any package is expected to have been tested with the latest at that time of any other relevant package. Of course bugs occur, sometimes something will be missed, but then it's just an update away to correct it. Or say Debian is not; a release is cut, tested, beta'd, and then made generally available - arguably more testing and a higher chance of finding a compatibility issue, but a slower cycle, potentially harder and slower to fix when something is missed.

  • PunchyHamster a day ago

    Linux is very much "pick your poison"

    Run Debian Stable and it basically doesn't happen - only updates are actual security ones.

    Run any rolling distro and you basically accept "with newest version comes the newest bugs"

    And there is a whole bunch of distros between those extremes ,depending on how new you need your software to be (that being said, Debian Testing hits nice mix between "new enough" and "someone actually tested stuff before publishing").

    • anal_reactor 21 hours ago

      Not only that, but compared to Windows 10, any Linux distro has objectively more bugs. Things like bluetooth not working, GPU-related failures, update issues, all the classics. While the current status of Linux is amazing, I still cannot recommend it to a non-tech person because I know something will fail at some point and then it's going to be my problem.

      • teddyh 20 hours ago

        Windows has tons of problem, but you don’t see them. That is, you see the problems, but attribute them to bad hardware. It works like this:

        Headset does not work on Linux: “This is crap, I’ll tell everybody I know to stay away from Linux!”

        Headset does not work on Windows: “This is crap, I’ll tell everybody I know to stay away from these headphones!”

        (Re-post from 2022: <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32541772>)

      • Nab443 17 hours ago

        YMMV, I have 2 headsets I've never been able to make working reliably under windows 10 and 11. Cheap stuff, but they are are flawless under linux and with my phone on android. Not to say there are no issue on Linux, but these days it's way better than 15 years ago.

  • sph a day ago

    Use better distros. I haven’t had a broken workstation since 2014 or so.

    • jack_tripper a day ago

      Which is that Linux desktop distro that never has issues?

      • sph a day ago

        The past 5 years I’ve used the atomic Fedora Silverblue, and I wouldn’t go back to anything else.

        Last month I have experienced the first major kernel bug in two decades, and all I had to do was reboot into the previous system update. Pretty painless.

        • [removed] 19 hours ago
          [deleted]
      • embedding-shape a day ago

        A recent HN submission has 300 comments, many talking about the stability about various distributions: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46095585

        I'm personally partial to Arch Linux, haven't had an issue with upgrades since I moved to it in ~2017, which was the last year I let Ubuntu's dist-upgrade break my work computer.

      • dspillett a day ago

        I've been using Debian:Stable on servers and occasionally on desktop for many years. I can't say I've ever had a problem due to a bad update.

        IIRC there have been a couple, but they've not affected the packages I was using, or I hadn't updated before the issues were spotted and resolved. The last half of that point is important: most Linux distros can be trusted to be left alone for 24 hours without coming back to find they've rebooted themselves, potentially losing work (or if not work, at least context so getting back to work takes longer than it should), without permission. Forcing updates and reboots might be acceptable when they cover a serious remote attack exposure bug, but Windows will reboot itself without permission even for relatively minor updates, and the fact it needs to reboot for so many minor things, where under Linux the updates might just need to restart a daemon or two rather than the whole OS, is irritating. Yes, there are ways to block Windows doing that, but you shouldn't have to fight your OS like that.

      • prmoustache 13 hours ago

        In my case it is Fedora, only problem I had in 10 years was an nvidia driver issue after one uodate on a pro laptop I didn't choose. The only thing I had to do was reboot to the previous kernel and use that n-1 kernel for a few days until the next kernel update.

        All my personal computers using intel and amd graphic cards have been faultless using same distro for the last decade.

      • pelagicAustral a day ago

        Nothing beats the stale, pragmatic platitude of Slackware.

      • weberer a day ago

        I've never had issues with Debian based distros.

      • PunchyHamster a day ago

        My desktop Debian was installed in 2008. I just upgraded it every major release. I am running on Testing so I had some very minor issues (mostly related to proprietary NVIDIA drivers, but even that got better), but at same time my NAS ran on Stable and it was problem-free.

      • matsz a day ago

        I've been running Arch (on my desktop and servers) for over a decade, and never had issues. Just read their homepage before upgrading.

  • jamesnorden a day ago

    This is 2000s era FUD.

    • jfindper 18 hours ago

      Yeah, exactly. We all know that Linux removed all bugs and made themselves bug-proof in the 2010s.

lionkor a day ago

Im always happy to update my arch install, because I usually get new features to play with, and my system has not broken due to updates in 4 years.

pjmlp a day ago

Better stick to LTS distros and even then....