robin_reala a day ago

I prepared three of the works listed here for Standard Ebooks, and I’m not in the US so I’m definitely not covered by US copyright law on my own machine.

kec a day ago

Why would that be the case? Copyright (at least in the US) only restricts distribution, performance and derivation.

  • fsckboy a day ago

    no, it restricts copying, making copies

    • kec a day ago

      “Copying” here refers to distribution and derivation, at least in the US. It is entirely legal to create copies of media for personal usage for instance (so long as you aren’t circumventing DRM, thanks DMCA).

      • fsckboy a day ago

        from the about page:

        Standard Ebooks is organized as a “low-profit L.L.C.,” or “L3C,” a kind of legal entity that blends the charitable focus of a traditional not-for-profit with the ease of organization and maintenance of a regular L.L.C.

        corporations cannot make "personal copies" of copyrighted works, otherwise they'd buy just one copy of microsoft office

        • swiftcoder a day ago

          > corporations cannot make "personal copies" of copyrighted works, otherwise they'd buy just one copy of microsoft office

          That would surely be a license violation, not a copyright violation?

          They absolutely can (and do) make copies of the Microsoft office binary and shuttle it around their network/backups/etc, activating licenses only when they need to assign a copy to a particular user

      • whamlastxmas a day ago

        This isn't correct. It is infringement, for example, to write Harry Potter fan fiction in private on a typewriter, even if another soul never sees it. Copyright includes creation, not just distribution