Comment by bonsai_spool

Comment by bonsai_spool 2 days ago

3 replies

> And what the OP is pointing out is that if your injury is $30K, insurance covers nothing, because the premium + deductible is $40K.

The point of insurance is to mitigate risk. If you think you have enough money to cover your risk, there's no reason to buy insurance.

The sleight of hand here is first complaining that you did not incur enough hazards to offset the risk premium and then citing this as a reason the risk premiums should not exist. Where is the story of the family being weighed down by bills? Or of not getting physical therapy after an injury and having permanent, income-reducing disabilities?

anon7000 a day ago

Risk is not the only factor. Premium cost is probably the more important one for most. If someone can afford the $40k deductible option, but not the $5k option, you’ll just have to accept the risk. Increasing earnings significantly right now is harder than hoping medical bankruptcy won’t matter in the long run.

30% of US households make less than $50k. That’s more than 100,000,000 people in homes with less than $3.6k/mo for all living expenses. The stories you ask for are simply inevitable

  • expedition32 a day ago

    In my country people are already complaining about a 300 euro deductible (my mom has a chronic illness so she hits that every year)...

    I surmise that either Americans are all rich and have 40k in savings that they can lose with no sweat or

    America is hell for anyone not rich

BeetleB 2 days ago

> The point of insurance is to mitigate risk.

Agreed - both to you and to society.

What's under debate is "how much risk." For most people in the US, they'll need help before they hit $40K. They can't afford paying $40K every year for medical and medical related expenses.