xyzelement 2 days ago

What does that mean? Plenty of people have been conceived in the backseat, and some in the front. But seriously, what are you talking about?

  • postflopclarity 2 days ago

    car-dependent infrastructure and urban design is hostile to human life.

    • barbacoa 2 days ago

      Car depend infrastructure is amazing to families. A mom can take her children to the grocery store in a car in relative safety without worrying about mentally ill homeless people on the subway.

      • lowkj a day ago

        Why would you need to get on the subway to go to the grocery store? When I lived in Paris I was within a five minute walk to at least three general grocery stores plus various speciality shops. Always plenty of parents all around. This is not uncommon in properly designed non-car dependent cities. Not to mention deliveries are just that much easier and all without a car.

      • jenadine a day ago

        A mom can also take her car in a non-car-dependent infrastructure.

      • piva00 a day ago

        In more than a decade living in Stockholm never had a mentally ill homeless person bothering anyone in the subway.

        Perhaps the subway itself isn't the problem...

      • cal_dent a day ago

        wow. this thread is microcosm of how wild and polarised the internet can be.

      • weregiraffe a day ago

        Men would rather build a continent-sized car-dependent infrastructure that deal with mentally ill homeless people on the subway...

      • ndsipa_pomu a day ago

        Surely the priority should be to help those with mental issues and those without homes? It's bizarre to want to live in a society that prioritises car use so that people don't have to see those discarded by the same society.