evanelias 2 days ago

That doesn't make sense to me. Are you saying your health insurance premiums would be $0 if you weren't planning on having children?

  • Aaronontheweb 2 days ago

    Did you try reading the lengthy section of the article where I answered your question?

    • evanelias 2 days ago

      I skimmed your 2400-word article a second time just now, and I still don't understand why your math is allocating 100% of your family's health insurance premiums to childbirth. And now I additionally don't understand your abrasive tone in answering this fairly straightforward question.

      Multiple commenters are raising this point, so perhaps you should consider that you aren't conveying this information well?

      • Aaronontheweb 2 days ago

        1. I mentioned, in multiple places, that this is the cheapest PPO offered to me through a limited selection of potential brokers / marketplaces - and that's important because it covers our current health care providers AND child birth as a benefit.

        2. If we weren't trying to have kids, our options for purchasing health insurance expand drastically. Individual marketplace plans become a viable, for instance, since the "not covering childbirth" issue goes away. I mention the short-comings of the individual health insurance marketplace at least twice in this regard, including a big pull quote explaining the ACA work-around with child birth coverage.