Comment by yen223

Comment by yen223 2 days ago

5 replies

Over here in Australia, the most expensive part of my kid's birth were the AUD$200 antenatal classes.

The prenatal checkups, hospital stay, and postnatal midwife home visits were all covered by Medicare.

The flip side is that I lose ~30% of my pay to taxes. That's fine by me

BeetleB 2 days ago

I pay almost 40% in the US (including state and payroll).

Federal tax rate is 22-24% for most people. State can be anywhere from 0 to over 10%, depending on the state and income level. City taxes may exist. And then social security + Medicare.

christina97 2 days ago

NYC effective tax rates exceed 30% (if earning in excess of $100k).

vkou 2 days ago

> The flip side is that I lose ~30% of my pay to taxes.

That's not a flip side, that's what you'd be paying in the US, too, once you account for all your payroll taxes. Maintaining 11 carrier strike groups and a global empire don't come for free.

  • alistairSH 2 days ago

    If only we paid only 30% in the US.

    If you're in the 24% bracket, you probably have an average rate around 18%. 7% personal FICA witholding, another 7% employer match, and state income tax. Then, if you're in the mood, add your health insurance premium and any college savings for you or your kids (or the difference between what we pay and what you'd pay in [insert some other country here]).

  • EA-3167 2 days ago

    Our military spending is enormous, but it's dwarfed by what we spend on healthcare. The problem with our healthcare system isn't that we have a military, it's the gross and intentional profit-seeking behavior of insurers and many others in the system. They see the government as a bottomless pit of money that they can tap with lobbying, and the result is that we pay stupid prices for absolutely everything, on the assumption that it will be negotiated down somewhat by private or public insurance.

    If you look at how $1 of public spending on healthcare is used in the US vs countries with better healthcare, it becomes obvious where the problem is, and it isn't in the ocean. An anti-military ideological stance is one thing, but you don't need to inject it into this.