Comment by A4ET8a8uTh0_v2

Comment by A4ET8a8uTh0_v2 2 days ago

See.. here is a problem. You say 'actual' ethics as if those were somehow universal and not ridiculously varied across the board. And I get it, you use the term, because a lot of readers will take it face value AND simply use their own value system to translate them into what agrees with them internally. I know, because I do the same thing when I try to not show exactly what I think to people at work. I just say sufficiently generic stuff to make people on both sides agree with a generic statement.

With that said, mister ants in the pants, what does actual mean to you in this particular instance?

balamatom 2 days ago

I don't know about ants (or pants) but

> I try to not show exactly what I think to people at work. I just say sufficiently generic stuff to make people on both sides agree with a generic statement.

basically the ethics of anyone who doesn't this

Reply View 6 replies

A4ET8a8uTh0_v2 2 days ago

Uhh.. do we really want to do ethics 101 ( and likely comparative religions based on your insisting all ethical considerations are universal across the human experience )? Please reconsider your statement, because it is not 'basically'; not by a long shot.

Reply View | 5 replies
- balamatom 2 days ago
  
  I don't know shit about ethics numbers. Nor do I believe in any comparative religions. All I know is that you claimed to do the following:
  > I try to not show exactly what I think to people at work. I just say sufficiently generic stuff to make people on both sides agree with a generic statement.
  Bravo! Encore! Teach us, wise master!
  
  Reply View | 4 replies
  
  satvikpendem a day ago
  
  I read this thread and I'm not even sure what your point is if all your comments are just going to be cryptic instead of actually stating your point clearly. As a reader, not even the person you're responding too, it's not useful to write like this.
  
  Reply View | 3 replies