handedness 2 days ago

> It is a dodgy Android distro for several reasons.

What are these reasons?

> LineageOS has no such shenanigans nor has a pattern of suspicious funding.

What pattern of suspicious funding?

  • nunobrito 2 days ago

    There are threads on YC almost every week/month promoting that dodgy distro. Inside them are the comments with proper details from plenty of other YC users.

    For the sake of avoiding repetition or bias, just do your own research. There is a search box at the end of the page.

snapcaster 2 days ago

you're all over this thread saying this, can you link an article or at least explain what you mean?

  • nunobrito 2 days ago

    It is tiresome to repeat every single time the arguments that so many other cyber experts have also mentioned including here on YC. This is quite the common knowledge by now.

    Kindly use the search box on the bottom of the page.

    • snapcaster a day ago

      In the time you've spent writing all these vague comments you could have just cleared up the confusion. I cared enough to read a comment you would write out, i really don't care enough to go research it

    • mac-attack 2 days ago

      Can you see how you look like a bad faith actor by making claims and they telling others to research your facts?

      • nunobrito a day ago

        It is tiresome to repeat the facts on each thread when this has already been thoroughly documented.

        I'm not your personal google search engine.

        • saagarjha a day ago

          But you are perfectly content to comment on this. Strange priorities, I guess?

    • fragmede a day ago

      That's because there aren't really any. Yes, it's kinda maddening that the best hardware to de-Google your life is to give Google even more money and buy a Google phone, but, after having used that search box, all I could find are complaints that it's not very usable because they disabled so much shit in the name of security and privacy, but I saw nothing where it fails at the technical details in protecting privacy. There's some purist bit about the timing of updates and availability of source due to embargoes, but even they are being practical in that case. So no, unless I missed something, it's not common knowledge, and you're just pretending there is to make it seem like there is something there when there isn't.

      • nunobrito 17 hours ago

        That is the first red flaming flag, yet you dismiss it like nothing albeit so many cybersec experts point out the same thing (references you can search them on previous discussions)

        The second is forgetting things like actively promoting the usage of US government developed and sponsored tech like signal and Tor.

        Then let's look at that availability of source code, which for some "reason" doesn't come out. Lest but not least, don't even wonder about their financing sources and constant spamming on sites like this as if there aren't better options.

        You can bot away and say none of this matters. It does matter, not everyone here is dumb and I'll keep complaining no matter how many times the other bots downvote what is obviously just another gov-sponsored operation.