Comment by LogicFailsMe
Comment by LogicFailsMe 2 days ago
That's a question for lawyers to resolve. IANAL but I have great faith in their ability to impose arbitrary roadblocks to anything as needed. And even if ultimately overturned, just making the bottom line more affordable allowing casting would seem to be the "shareholder value" friendly message. Further, there was already precedent for such behavior on Netflix with some content being downloadable for later viewing and some not.
I'm a bit surprised that you think Google and the streaming services are helpless here when pretty much every foundation model effort has stolen tremendous amounts of IP to build their AI models without consequence.
Otherwise, frog.pot.boiled, no?
> I'm a bit surprised that you think Google and the streaming services are helpless here
They own about 0 rights to the content they stream.
Netflix almost collapsed when major studios pulled their content to create competing platforms. That's why they spent to the tune of 8 billion dollars a year to produce their own content and flooded the service with mediocre movies and a bunch of Korean movies and series. Also that's why you can watch the content they have rights to in every country, download it etc.
That's the same reason why AppleTV is busy creating their own content etc.
If streaming platforms dare to go against rights holders, the lawsuits will hurt even Google.
As for AI: it doesn't hurt the rights holders yet. The moment it does, you'll see lawsuits.