Comment by ghaff

Comment by ghaff 2 days ago

6 replies

Rent can be pretty cheap depending upon where you live. If you want to live in a high cost of living area, that's a form of consumption.

johnnyanmac 2 days ago

>If you want to live in a high cost of living area, that's a form of consumption.

Not really a "want" as much as "move where the jobs are". Remote jobs are shakey now and being in the middle of nowhere only worsens your compensation aspects. Being able to live wherever you please is indeed a luxury. The suburb structure already sacrificed the aspect of high CoL for increase commute time to work.

I also do think that dismissing aspects of humanity like family, community and sense of purpose to "luxuries" is an extremely dangerous line of thinking.

  • ghaff 20 hours ago

    In most places (SF may be somewhat of an exception in terms of relatively unaffordable housing in both the city and any accessible suburbs) 30-60 minute commutes are pretty normal. At least a lot of the companies are probably in the suburbs/exurbs anyway. I'm not suggesting living in the middle of nowhere but, in a lot of places, urban vs. exurban living is a choice especially with companies that are often exurban.

wizzwizz4 2 days ago

If I live somewhere, and maintain the building myself, what's being consumed?

  • ipdashc 2 days ago

    The spot of land is being consumed, no? If it's HCoL, clearly that's land that a lot of people wish they could live on but can't.

    • wizzwizz4 2 days ago

      But I'm not paying rent to them.

      • ipdashc 2 days ago

        I mean, yeah? Does any market work like that? If you want an apple, you pay the person who has the apple to take it from them, you don't pay the other people who want apples. Not really following where this is going