Comment by magicalist

Comment by magicalist 2 days ago

2 replies

Is your argument that Terence Tao says it was a consequence from a known result and he categorizes it as low hanging fruit, but to you it feels like one of those things that's only obvious in retrospect after it's explained to you, and without "evidence" of Tao's claim, you're going to go with your vibes?

What exactly would constitute evidence?

menaerus 2 days ago

Known result from where? I failed to see the reference where it was proven before. Maybe I missed it. Do you have a reference?

adastra22 2 days ago

Consequence from a known result describes literally every proof.