Comment by MisterTea

Comment by MisterTea 2 days ago

7 replies

What surprises me the most is the 1GB option is even viable though I can imagine this will be for IoT users who shove Pi's into things doing embedded stuff where a kernel with a few user space things along with maybe a container are doing all the work.

overfeed 2 days ago

> What surprises me the most is the 1GB option is even viable...

There are plenty of non-IoT use cases that are viable with 1GB of general-purpose compute. Hell, I rented an obscenely cheap 512MB VPS until recently, and only abandoned it because its ancient kernel version was a security risk.

Most of my RPi tasks are not memory-bound

pjerem 2 days ago

Probably but I fail to see what use case doesn't need more than 1Gb but can't be done already with a Pi 3b or 4.

  • Mashimo 2 days ago

    I have a Pi3b in a 3D printer, and compiling the software, but also simply apt upgrade feels like it takes forever. Most day to day operations work just fine though.

    At work we have a display with a Pi3 (not B) connected, just showing websites in rotation. Websites even with a simple animation are laggy, startup takes a few minutes.

    Both of these usecases don't need more than 1 GB of ram, but I want to speed of a 4 or 5.

    • dwedge a day ago

      The 4 and 5 are pretty laggy too. An improvement, but slow.

  • geerlingguy 2 days ago

    Usually it's just "same thing but faster". CPU is 2-3x faster, and even boot speed is faster, so it can be handy to not have to wait so long to run updates, compile something, reboot, etc.

shrx 2 days ago

Well to be honest, I'm doing just fine with my 1 GB Pi3B home server. Sure, another gigabyte wouldn't hurt, but I'm able to run influxd, zigbee2mqtt, telegraf, grafana, homeassistant (containerized), mpd and navidrome on it without issues.

segmondy a day ago

you would be surprised to find out some of us are doing fine with 512mb pi zero w.