amelius 2 days ago
  • phantasmish 2 days ago

    I directly use Yandex sometimes, because there are huge blind spots for all the US-based engines I'm aware of, and it fills some of them in.

    If someone can point me to a better index for that purpose, I'd love to avoid Yandex. Please inform me.

  • smusamashah 2 days ago

    There are few other powerful countries, with countless Web services, who freely wages war(s) on other countries and support wars in many different ways. Is there a way to avoid their products?

    • mcv 2 days ago

      As a European, I'm also increasingly in favour of avoiding American companies. Especially the big corrupting near-monopolists.

      It's worth pointing out the flaws of all bad actors. The more info we have, the more effectively we can act.

    • jwr 2 days ago

      Whataboutism doesn't get us anywhere — saying "but what about X" (insert anything for X here) usually results in doing nothing.

      Some of us would rather take a stand, imperfect as it is, than just sit and do nothing. Especially in the very clear case of someone (Kagi) doing business with a country that invaded a neighboring country for no reason, and keeps killing people there.

      • graemep 2 days ago

        Why this particular stand? Is doing nothing any better than taking what are essentially random stands? Obviously if you are Ukrainian this will be an important stand to you, but otherwise doing things based on a mix of what the media you like focuses on or whatever is not really very different from doing nothing.

      • smusamashah 20 hours ago

        I was very conscious of this comment being called out as a 'whatabout', it was still only thing I could think of and wrote it bit carefully.

        My point was that we should either not take an issue with things like this and block everything in the whole country because their government is bad. Or we should do the same for other countries too.

      • immibis a day ago

        Google is worse than Yandex, no? At this time, Russia is (debatably*) more evil than the USA, but that doesn't mean Yandex is more evil than Google. And I'm told Yandex has better search results.

        * most of the evil stuff Russia's done, the USA's done way more of

      • pessimizer 19 hours ago

        Not only is "whataboutism" literally anti-communist jargon, you're using it wrong. It was meant to refer to when the US would criticize some aspect of the USSR and the USSR would point to the fact that the US was an apartheid state. The point was that the accusation that the US was making was entirely different from the observation that the USSR was making - it was simply a change of subject.

        You can't call for a boycott on a cosmetics company that experiments on dogs if you are a rival cosmetics company that experiments on ten times as many dogs.

      • artursapek 2 days ago

        “whataboutism” is the reddit word for calling out hypocrisy

  • Ferret7446 2 days ago

    I find this amusing, because it seems like Kagi's target audience dislikes this (politically polarized), and I as someone who is not Kagi's target audience likes this (politically neutral).

    • bawolff 2 days ago

      Politics is not just a 1 dimensional line.

      • saturnite 2 days ago

        Yeah, it's two dimensional. One axis goes from good to evil. The other axis, chaotic to lawful.

    • [removed] 2 days ago
      [deleted]
    • embedding-shape 2 days ago

      Wait, what? Their choice is specifically a politically neutral one, wouldn't that mean their target audience is a politically neutral one? Why is your impression that Kagi's target audience is politically polarized users? Been a paying user of Kagi for years, never got that impression.

      FWIW, I don't think Kagi should remove or avoid indexing content from countries that invade others, because a lot of the times websites in those countries have useful information on them. If Kagi were to enact such a block, it would mean it would no longer surface results from HN, reddit and a bunch of other communities, effectively making the search engine a lot less useful.

      • [removed] 2 days ago
        [deleted]
    • brendoelfrendo 2 days ago

      Why is supporting Yandex, who are involved in Russian politics and linked to the ruling regime, a neutral decision? That is very much a political decision, in the same way that working with US tech companies is a political decision. You need to decide what you're willing to tolerate and where your ethical lines are drawn; the alternative isn't neutrality, it's nihilism.

      • hambes a day ago

        Because when Ferret7446 says "neutral", they mean "anything that doesn't harm them". Centrism is a lie.

      • lostlogin 2 days ago

        Solution: Kagi as it is, but with a ‘remove Yandex’ toggle. Even if it was a paid upgrade, I’d take it.

      • immibis a day ago

        Same reason supporting Google, Microsoft, YCombinator is a neutral decision.

        Kagi uses both Yandex and Google btw.

  • xzjis 21 hours ago

    I don't like defending Russia which is a horrible country, but I find it hypocritical to only talk about their imperialism and pretend not to see that the most imperialist country in the world, the one that has started, financed, and participated in the most wars, is the United States, and yet the question of boycotting American companies is never brought up. Google has been intentionally sabotaged in terms of image search and reverse image search; Yandex is literally the best on the market, but Kagi should boycott them because their headquarters are in the wrong country?

  • super256 2 days ago

    Yandex has the best image search, and others are years behind it. Further more Nebius has sold all group’s businesses in Russia and certain international market. They are completely divested from Russia for a 1.5 years already: https://nebius.com/newsroom/ynv-announces-successful-complet...

    The post you linked was posted when the divestment was already going underway, so it is at least dishonest if not malicious.

    • varjag 2 days ago

      Yandex is the government approved search engine in Russia, which is impossible without the state exerting control over it. I wouldn't pay much attention to divestment, it's not how any of that works.

      For instance here you can learn that Yandex NV is fully controlled by a group of Russian investors: https://www.rbc.ru/business/06/03/2024/65e7a0f29a7947609ea39...

      • stopthe 2 days ago

        Some clarification. Since 2024 Yandex NV split into Nebius (NL-registred NASDAQ-listed company, no longer a search engine) and russian-based Yandex. The latter is fully controlled by russian investors.

      • oh_fiddlesticks 2 days ago

        The government's where the offices of a software company are physically located exert control over them. To follow this logic to its end and apply it even handedly results in nation based NIH syndrome surely?

    • cluckindan 2 days ago

      I wouldn’t trust a divorce where one party still provides for the other.

      • _heimdall 2 days ago

        You don't "trust" a divorce is alimony was part of the settlement?

    • hopelite 2 days ago

      You are mistaken to think that zealots can be reasoned with. They have been conditioned to react upon anything “Russia” like a Pavlovian cue, a command of the trained animal. They are a herd that moves as a herd, based on cues of lead animals. No amount of proof or evidence will ever dissuade them from a position that the herd is moving in. They cannot reason on their own and lack the courage to separate, let alone say something that the herd disapproves of, lest they be expelled from the herd and ganged up on.

  • duxup 2 days ago

    Yeah I kept thinking "man I should try kagi" and then that :(

    • akie 2 days ago

      Try it anyway.

      • duxup 2 days ago

        Naw, the well is poisoned and I question the company's decision making at this point.

      • alessioalex 2 days ago

        He probably doesn’t want to support genocide.

  • justinclift 2 days ago

    Damn. I didn't know that.

    Now we need a 2nd Kagi, so we can switch to that one instead. :(

  • eirini1 2 days ago

    I don't agree with this logic. It implies that people who use Google, Bing and a million other products made by US-based companies are supportive of the huge amount of attrocities commited or aided by the United States. Or other countries. It feels very odd to single out Russia's invasion of Ukraine but to minimize the Israeli genocide of palestinians in Gaza, the multiple unjust wars waged by the United States all over the world etc.

    • kortilla 2 days ago

      Google doesn’t censor those atrocities for the US government. That’s the key difference.

      • ssl-3 2 days ago

        It's often fairly easy to find US government-centric news and criticism with Google.

        But as one counterexample: The end of the US penny was formed and announced not with public legislative discourse, nor even with an executive order, but with a brief social media post by the president.

        And I don't mean that it's atrocious or anything, but I wanted to see that social media post myself. Not a report about it, or someone's interpretation of it, but -- you know -- the actual utterance from the horse's mouth.

        Which should be a simple matter. After all, it's the WWW.

        And I've been Googling for as long as there has been a Google to Google with. I'd like to think that I am proficient at getting results from it.

        But it was like pulling teeth to get Google to eventually, kicking and screaming, produce a link to the original message on Truth Social.

        If that kind of active reluctance isn't censorship on Google's part, then what might it be described as instead?

        And if they're seeking to keep me away from the root of this very minor issue, then what else might they also be working to keep me from?

      • DANmode a day ago

        Not overtly - and not all of the things the US as a whole may want.

        But Google does censor.

      • parliament32 2 days ago

        I have yet to see any kind of censorship when querying Yandex, do you have any examples?

    • baconbrand 2 days ago

      It doesn’t imply any of that at all.

      There certainly is a huge army of people ready to spout this sort of nonsense in response to anyone talking about doing anything.

      Hard to know what percentage of these folks are trying to assuage their own guilt and what percentage are state actors. Russia and Israel are very chronically online, and it behooves us internet citizens to keep that in mind.

  • buellerbueller 2 days ago

    Imo, Kagi is still the better option, because it isn't supporting the global surveillance mechanism we call advertising. All these people, missing the forest for the single yandex tree.

  • troyvit 2 days ago

    So if America invades Venezuela should we all stop using google? Should we have stopped using google when the U.S. invaded Iraq and killed 150,000 people[1]?

    Should we stop using products imported from China for the cultural genocide they've perpetrated against the Uyghurs?[2]

    Is Yandex Russia?

    [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_Iraq_War

    [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution_of_Uyghurs_in_Chin...

    • alessioalex 2 days ago

      You can take whatever stand you want. When there’s a country that killed, raped and tried to exterminate most of Eastern Europe we can choose to cut any and all ties with it and consider them for all intents and purposes ..terrorists.

      • troyvit 2 days ago

        I sort-of see where you're coming from, but it also ignores a double standard to me. Don't buy search from a company that uses an api from another company that is (or was? unclear) based in a country that invaded another country and completely upended the world order. For some people that's a line that they don't want to cross and I get it.

        However if that's the case how can they continue buying Chinese products when China has done the same thing, but worse, and for longer, to their own population? Because it's less convenient to stop? _That_ to me lands squarely in the "take whatever stand you want" category with the addendum of, "and don't worry if it doesn't make sense."

        Is it because it's within their own borders and therefore isn't our problem?

      • mcv 2 days ago

        And the fact that there are other countries that should also be considered terrorists, doesn't mean we shouldn't boycott this one. It means we should boycott them all. But boycotting a few is still better than nothing.

    • brendoelfrendo 2 days ago

      Honest answers are yes, yes, and yes. It may be unavoidable for the average person to avoid imported goods from China, but we should remain aware of our place in the world and try where we can. If the US does invade Venezuela, I sincerely hope that individuals and business owners try to cut as many ties with complicit US tech companies as possible. Honestly, with this clusterfuck of war crimes going on over "drug boats," I hope they're already starting.

  • scotty79 2 days ago

    > "We do not discriminate based on current geopolitical issues."

    That's one way of phrasing it.

  • spIrr 2 days ago

    Thank you. Didn't know that and was, until now, considering paying for a Kagi subscription.

  • Seattle3503 2 days ago

    I'm surprised this is possible given the sanctions on Russia.

  • immibis 2 days ago

    Why's that something to be aware of? Yandex is actually a good search engine, so I'm told, as long as you don't search for things related to Russian politics. Kagi presumably knows this and won't use their results related to Russian politics.

    Feels more like a scare campaign to me - someone doesn't want you to use Kagi, and points to Yandex as a reason for that.

  • devmor 2 days ago

    Kagi is based in the United States, as is YC.

    If you are concerned about heinous war crimes and the slaughter of civilians to the point that you don't want to use private services from countries that conduct such acts, you should avoid both already.

  • stronglikedan 2 days ago

    Meh. Most people, including myself, couldn't care less, and Yandex image search is very capable.

  • DontForgetMe a day ago

    I remain amazed by the lack of attention given to this.

    Regardless of one's position on the 'everything online is Russian propaganda, Russian bots or misinformation - invest in sickles and hammers, comrade / wtf just use basic common sense and the internet is as safe as it ever was' continuum, such universal enthusiasm for a Russian-owned, Russian-controlled search engine should generate a little more counter-argument, at the very least.

    Absolutely no mention of Google, Bing, Startpage, DDG, or even Mojeek search engines usually pass online without somebody detailing the problems, flaws, or why they're not as good as the alternatives. Usually, at least 20% of the comments will be overtly critical, with at least 1 person passionately arguing that this search engine is going to destroy life as we know it / funds genocide / is an abomination unto God.

    On open forums and spaces where a variety of users and tastes are represented, that minimum level of criticism usually applies to absolutely everything from movies to toothbrushing techniques to kids' TV to low-carb breakfasts. If more than 3 people care enough about something to discuss it, at least 1 of those people will hate it and feel the need to enunciate why.

    Except Kagi. Kagi must enjoy the highest praise-criticism ratio of anything I've ever seen on the web, including concepts like sunshine and heaven and the eradication of polio.

    Seriously. The only 'real' criticism I ever see of Kagi is like 'I personally don't like it because I don't think a search engine is worth more than $19.99' or 'unfortunately I need x feature', and it's always followed by a reply saying 'Ah, well Kagi is now available for $19.50' or 'you'll be thrilled to know that x feature can be enabled in Kagi by following these steps'.

    And the occasional 'I don't use it because it seemed a bit wierd and wasn't worth it' comment languishing on the outskirts of the discussion.

    So yeah. I do not expect this comment to stir much discussion, mainly because it's like 24 hours after the main debate and is on a pretty low-impact thread on hacker news from an uninspiring new ish account. But also because Kagi critical comments are written in sand, whatever the discussion or authority or audience.

    That should make people more suspicious.

    • justinclift 15 hours ago

      > But also because Kagi critical comments are written in sand, whatever the discussion or authority or audience.

      Maybe people just turn up too late and their comments generally aren't seen?

tempacct2cmmnt 2 days ago

I’ve had much better results with Kagi than with Google in the past few months. I’d trialed them a couple times in the past and been disappointed, but that’s no longer the case.

PaulDavisThe1st 2 days ago

The AI stuff in google search can be turned off.

  https://www.google.com/search?udm=14&q=kagi
My default browser search tool is set to google with ?udm=14 automatically appended.
dncornholio 2 days ago

How does Kagi know what is AI stuff? I don't see how they can 'just turn it off'

  • justinclift 2 days ago

    By "turn it off" I mostly mean that Kagi have their own AI driven tools available, but a toggle in your user settings disables it completely.

    ie it's not forced down your throat, nor mysteriously/accidentally/etc turned back on occasionally

  • Zambyte 2 days ago

    It's driven by community ratings.

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45919067

    • pratyahava 2 days ago

      so it is like humans vs robots started? robots ask humans questions to verify they are not robots. humans mark content as robot-generated to filter it out.

    • pvdebbe 2 days ago

      My first instinct is that users abuse it like they do any other report/downvote mechanism. They see something they just don't plain like, they report it as AI slop.

vivzkestrel a day ago

what if there was an open source search engine that contributors kept making better but it was a paid subscription tool?