Comment by hoherd

Comment by hoherd 3 days ago

4 replies

Sure, but sellers in those countries found the service to be very valuable. The framing of this situation as being beneficial to the cooperation and detrimental to the consumer feeds the narrative of the Evil Corporation, which is sad.

It's really unfortunate that LEGO acquired Bricklink, and then did this, but it's such a common storyline.

jacquesm 3 days ago

Make no mistake: Lego makes a great product but they are an evil corporation. They have been so from the day they started making bricks (they stole the design, the marketing content and even the boxes), they continued when they sued everybody and their dog for doing the same thing that they themselves did, only much worse, and finally they did it again when they acquired Bricklink and started merging accounts with the Lego website. And probably many times in between when they created incompatibilities between older and newer sets just to drive sales.

  • PostOnce 3 days ago

    Lego... incompatibilities?

    Isn't compatibility a huge part of the draw of Lego?

    I've never heard of incompatibilities, what are they?

    The only problem I've noticed product wise is there are now mold defects after they started adding recycled plastic, only one or two minor (visual surface) imperfections per box, but before, there were none.

    • bombcar 3 days ago

      Perhaps a reference to the change of the color grey (now in time immemorial) to “bley” or bluish gray.

      Tons of e-ink spilled over it and some never recovered.

    • butvacuum 3 days ago

      Probably the bionicals... Disaster?

      Lots of those pieces look like technics, but aren't.