Comment by jacquesm

Comment by jacquesm 3 days ago

Imagine a world where the Apple II had a 6800 later upgraded to 6809...

hashmash 3 days ago

It wouldn't have happened because the 6809 wasn't binary compatible with the 6800.

djmips 2 days ago

The 6809 was SOURCE compatible with the 6800 - you can assemble 6800 code on a 6809 assembler and it will run with perhaps very minor tweaks.

Reply View | 0 replies
jacquesm 3 days ago

So?

Reply View | 3 replies
- hashmash 3 days ago
  
  Because none of the existing software would work. The idea of running a Rosetta-like feature on an 8-bit CPU isn't feasible. The Apple II eventually received an upgraded processor, the 65816, which was compatible with the 6502.
  
  Reply View | 2 replies
  
  jecel 2 days ago
  
  Though a problem, as you point out, it still happened. The 6800 based SWTPC was followed by 6809 machines what need to have all their software reassembled.
  On the other side of the cpu wars, all those 8080 machines moving on the Z80s got to keep all their binary software, which happened again for IBM PCs and clones as those evolved.
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SWTPC_6800
  
  Reply View | 0 replies
  
  jacquesm 2 days ago
  
  In those days nobody cared about binary compatibility. If you had an assembler and the source code you were all set.
  
  Reply View | 0 replies

bsder 3 days ago

Then the Apple II would never have sold.

The 6800 was expensive versus the 6502--almost 10x (6502 was $25 when the 6800 was $175 which was already reduced from $360)!

jacquesm 3 days ago

Yes, I was thinking more from a tech perspective, not from a price perspective.

Reply View | 0 replies
djmips 2 days ago

And yeah, there was a 6502 Apple I too!

Reply View | 0 replies