Comment by jacquesm

Comment by jacquesm 3 days ago

1 reply

> If we're assuming a nuclear war then the US military is comparable to a bunch of other militarys.

What a nonsense. Really, if we're assuming a nuclear war then the remainder of the sentence no longer has any relevance.

Note that even the idiot in the Kremlin has been given reasons enough to consider that one off the table no matter how much he might want it (assuming he still can).

First strike is a non-starter for every sane country, so you better hope that sanity lasts long enough to get to the '.' at the end of your sentences. Because if it does not the best you can hope for is live near ground zero.

> Does the US military even perform to spec? There is clearly a lot of corruption and I've seen it described on HN as a disguised welfare program.

If you're aware of any American gear that has not performed in the last 12 months then maybe you should report it rather than to resort to 'just asking questions'.

So far all of the recipients seem to be fairly happy with the deliveries and most nations would quake in their boots if the USA set their sights on them with intent to punish, bar none, and to suggest otherwise is seriously ignorant.

roenxi 2 days ago

> If you're aware of any American gear that has not performed in the last 12 months then maybe you should report it rather than to resort to 'just asking questions'.

I'm not thinking of anything specific, but if you want to talk gear it is notable that US gear has failed to stabilise the front-line in Ukraine so it obviously isn't that amazing. I'm reading fairly consistent reports that the US has lost the manufacturing base to compete against the Russians [0] and Asians [1].

Compare that to the nominal spending figures [2] and the official figures for how strong the US is appear to be overstating their ability to actually win in a conflict. The money spent doesn't seem to be going in to creating a strong military as much as overcoming deficits in their ability to produce stuff.

And "questions" in the plural generally means someone asked more than one question. It's "just asking a question" in the singular.

[0] https://euromaidanpress.com/2025/06/09/russia-outguns-nato-p...

[1] https://www.csis.org/analysis/china-dominates-shipbuilding-i...

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_with_highest...