Comment by pfdietz

Comment by pfdietz 3 days ago

3 replies

Strategic motivation? If one assumes the US is going to be globally involved, yes, but that's begging the question.

Economic motivation? Not so much now, with the US being a dominant oil producer, and with petroleum itself losing importance. Even then, it's questionable if this could justify the full cost of the US military.

I think the original motivation was two fold: it was a combination of some sort of moral obligation to defend the "free world" from authoritarians, and (after WW2) a desire to keep small countries (and recent WW2 enemies) from deciding their only option for defense was their own nuclear deterrent.

amanaplanacanal 3 days ago

I don't see much evidence that's the US wants to defend the world from authoritarians. Some of their closest allies are authoritarian countries.

  • pfdietz 3 days ago

    Expansionist authoritarians, which in the post war world was communists.

    Why would the world need defending from non-expansionist authoritarians?

    • amanaplanacanal 3 days ago

      Maybe. They seem to actually like expansionist authoritarians now. Evidence being the Russia Ukraine peace effort.