bjt 3 days ago

Neither are the Zigtools folks. If you've ever run an open source project, you know that instead of running on money, they run on community goodwill. Having people take the project's creation, claim it as their own, and not comply with the license, are all damaging to people's motivation to contribute.

jesseb34r 3 days ago

Misinformation and poor learning tools can do real damage to the experience of new zig users, which is incredibly meaningful.

  • vasco 3 days ago

    Censorship is even worse

    • swiftcoder 3 days ago

      Requesting attribution (as the MIT license demands), hardly rises to the level of "censorship"

      • ayhanfuat 3 days ago

        I think they are referring to the fact that the zigbook maintainer defaced the PR that fixed the license issue by editing out the PR description.