Comment by mbesto

Comment by mbesto 4 days ago

53 replies

Datacenters in space is about circumventing nation states masked as ambitions to generate more power.

Follow the rationale:

1. Nation states ultimately control three key infrastructure pieces required to run data centers (a) land (protected by sovereign armed forces) (b) internet / internet infra (c) electricity. If crypto ever became a legitimate threat, nation states could simply seize any one of or all these three and basically negate any use of crypto.

2. So, if you have data centers that no longer rely on power derived from a nation state, land controller by a nation state or connectivity provided by the nation state's cabling infra, then you can always access your currency and assets.

zbentley 3 days ago

That’s ridiculous. Space is the least nation-state-dependent place to do computing in existence.

All proposed space computing has an incredibly short orbital lifespan (less than 5y).

Every single space launch capable rocket provider in the world is financially, regulatorily, and militarily joined at the hip to a single government. No launches are taking place without that government’s say-so.

Also, space infrastructure is incredibly vulnerable to attack by nation-states as many others in this thread have pointed out.

  • dragonelite 3 days ago

    That really depends on the cost asymmetry between building + launching sats being cheaper or more expensive than taking down all those sats.

  • larodi 3 days ago

    many a cloud equipment has very short lifespan

wat10000 3 days ago

Putting data centers on ships in international waters would be just as effective at evading government control (i.e. not very) while being orders of magnitude easier and cheaper to build and operate.

  • bouncycastle 3 days ago

    Recently the USA blew out some some boats in international waters and came back to finish off the survivors, despite thin evidence and no due process, while maintaining that it was legal. If those data centers on ships ever become declared as a 'threat to national security' then they might get the same treatment.

    • collinmcnulty 3 days ago

      I think GP's point is that an advanced nation-state could just as easily shoot down an orbiting data center as an oceanic data center and that "international space" offers an equally flimsy defense as "international waters" but a much larger price.

      • ACCount37 3 days ago

        Antisatellite weapons are expensive and rare, and also woefully inadequate for dealing with megaconstellations.

        If there's one large orbital datacenter, then sure, ASAT is a threat to it. But if it's a dispersed swarm like the Starlink system?

        Good luck making a dent in that. You'd run out of ASAT long before Musk runs out of Starlink.

    • gpm 3 days ago

      This would be equally true in space.

    • [removed] 3 days ago
      [deleted]
    • NoMoreNicksLeft 3 days ago

      If those ships chose to not fly a flag, they'd even have justification to do so. And if they did choose to fly a flag, then that country would have the responsibility to police them, and is the US complained to that country, that country might just withdraw protection anyway. Data center ships just want to loiter where convenient, they're not cigarette boats flying along at 100mph... no way to evade a navy that wants to blow them out of the water.

  • echelon 3 days ago

    They've always been able to do this.

    Microsoft was talking about submarine data centers powered by tidal forces in the early 2000s.

    There have been talks of data centers on Sealand-like nation states.

    Geothermal ...

    Exotic data center builds will always be hyped. Always be within the realm of feasibility when cost is no object, but probably outside of practicality or need.

    Next it'll be fusion-powered data centers.

    • cwal37 3 days ago

      Commonwealth Fusion Systems called dibs on next last year by saying they’re gonna have a Dominion (Virginia) commercial site up and running in the early 2030s.

      https://cfs.energy/news-and-media/commonwealth-fusion-system...

      • rgmerk 3 days ago

        Is there a way I can take bets on this not happening? Because I’d sure like to.

        • cwal37 3 days ago

          Despite the massive PPAs that have already been signed on a chunk of the plant’s planned output I also find it very hard to believe.

__turbobrew__ 4 days ago
tetha 3 days ago

This is one of the early tipping points in the background of the game "Eclipse Phase", which I always found interesting:

--- >8 ---

The power of nation states is rooted in control of land and safety, as well as resources, which is an extension of the control of land. But once mining asteroids became economically viable, the connection between land and resources disappeared. Once space habitation in space and secretly developed weapon systems from space became viable, the connection between safety, habitation and land disappeared.

This allowed corporations and new organizations to rise to power large enough to challenge nation states. Those in power did feared to lose their power, which caused the great war which gave rise to the grey mass and destroyed earth.

--- 8< ---

It's a very cool back story, which gives rise to a rogue nanite swarm (the gray mass), which forces an evacuation of earth within days. The only way this was even possible was by uploading human minds onto storage and planting them in robots later on. Naturally, most humans are then forced to work for these corporations. Other humans are still biological and they don't like robots, to say the least.

Analemma_ 4 days ago

I'm sorry, but this is stupid. It's the same dumb thinking behind Sealand: "we're outside state borders! nobody can touch us!", which was only true as long as nobody cared what they were doing. Once Sealand actually started angering people, the Royal Navy showed up and that was that. "Datacenters in space" wouldn't fare any better: multiple nations have successfully tested anti-satellite weapons.

snowwrestler 3 days ago

If you can control satellites from the ground, then so can the government governing that ground location. An armed 10-person strike team could force SpaceX to access or even de-orbit the entire Starlink constellation. They don’t because doing so would be illegal and dangerous, not because it is somehow technically difficult.

_heimdall 3 days ago

If a company were to go on its own and build data centers in space only to avoid nation state jurisdiction, they better be prepares to defend that hardware in space.

If a country doesn't like what is happening they can shoot it down, and with no humans onboard or nations claiming jurisdiction there really isn't much to stop them or to answer for.

zie 4 days ago

Except the people that run and manage that satellite will be on earth, under some nation state's rules...

  • PunchyHamster 4 days ago

    corporations will use their knowledge in tax dodging to avoid that too.

    • MadnessASAP 4 days ago

      If they're already well versed in dodging fiscal rules, why do they need a space computer?

      • suriya-ganesh 4 days ago

        Physical location is difficult to dodge unfortunately.

        Fiscal rules are sort of man made.

nrhrjrjrjtntbt 3 days ago

By the same argument Google could start literal star wars by blowing up AWS data centres. Because it is the wild west up there right? No pesky laws.

DennisP 3 days ago

If crypto were the reason for the orbital data centers, then an easier path would be to use crypto that doesn't require huge data centers. That's pretty much any proof-of-stake blockchain, especially the more decentralized ones.

Spooky23 4 days ago

Data centers in space is about leading investors to circumvent their brains and jump on the hype train at worst, and developing technology around data center infrastructure at best.

Microsoft did something similar with their submarine data center pilots. This gets more press because AI.

AndrewStephens 3 days ago

This is the only "advantage" I can see with space-based datacenters. Crypto will remain a joke but putting devices beyond the reach of ground-based jurisdictions is a libertarian dream. It will probably fail - you still need plenty of ground infrastructure.

dudeinjapan 4 days ago

Nation states can fire missiles at your space datacenter, bruh.

  • hedora 4 days ago

    Or just triangulate any signals being sent to it, and fire missiles at the source.