Comment by dannyfritz07

Comment by dannyfritz07 4 days ago

5 replies

View on Hacker News

I've been messing with sandboxing using "bwrap" for random itch.io games I download to play and it isn't trivial to get it working with least privileges. I have so far been unable to get "Microlandia" to run, but other Unity games are running just fine under "bwrap". I am excited to see more Landlock tools emerge that make this task easier.

- https://github.com/containers/bubblewrap

- https://codeberg.org/dannyfritz/dotfiles/src/commit/38343008...

- https://explodi.itch.io/microlandia

webstrand 4 days ago

I was just playing with bwrap for isolating npm project actions from the rest of my system.

    bwrap --unshare-pid --dev-bind / / --tmpfs /home --bind "$(pwd)" "$(pwd)" bash
it seems to work fairly well? But I just started playing with bwrap this weekend. I do wish bwrap could be told "put the program in this pre-prepared network namespace" because accessing unsecured local dev servers could also be an issue.
Reply View 4 replies
  • tommica 3 days ago

    I had this idea of having toolbox+custom user for each project - that way it would be "simple" to have isolated environments, but it does lead to a lot of bloat. And I do think it is a naive solution.

    Bwrap seems like a better option.

    Reply View 3 replies
    • jeroenhd 3 days ago

      I think a combination of custom users + a whole bunch of sandboxing is exactly what you'd get out of systemd-nspawn if you're willing to write the config: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Systemd-nspawn

      bwrap seems a lot easier but if you want more control (or, for instance, want to run a Ubuntu basis because that's what a lot of games are compiled against), systemd-nspawn can be quite powerful.

      Reply View 0 replies
    • bflesch 3 days ago

      thats how android does it. every app is different user.

      Reply View 1 reply