Comment by jaccola

Comment by jaccola 4 days ago

27 replies

View on Hacker News

I feel the same fallacies happen with money and degrees:

- People with more money live better lives, so let's just print/hand out money and everyone will live a better life!

- People with college degrees live better lives, so let's just push more people through college and everyone will live better lives!

In both cases, of course, completely missing the underlying reasons money/college degrees provide(d) better lives.

It's hard to believe that any single person in government truly thinks printing money will increase resources or that more easily handing out college degrees will automatically make everyone better off. So I don't fully understand how this happens, perhaps pandering to the electorate.

satvikpendem 4 days ago

It's a prime example of the tragedy of the commons and there's honestly not much that can be done because of how competition on the supply side of the labor market works; for employers, a degree is no longer a differentiator among candidates.

Reply View 1 reply
  • baq 3 days ago

    It isn’t in that it doesn’t guarantee a job, but not having one all but guarantees HR drones will discard your CV algorithmically.

    Reply View 0 replies
JKCalhoun 4 days ago

Consider the contraposition.

• Poor people live shorter, unhealthier lives.

• Without a college degree, your employment options are diminished.

It's fine to trash "handing out money" or "pushing more people through college" but then what is left is: there's nothing we can do for poor people.

Reply View 11 replies
  • anon291 4 days ago

    Of course there is. You can just hire them and train them. Most positions don't require college degrees. Everything you need to know for most jobs you learned in high school. At most you need a certificate program of some kind.

    Reply View 5 replies
    • JKCalhoun 3 days ago

      Construction, a few trades… Help me, I've run out of ideas without resorting to "Walmart Greeter".

      Most of those jobs went overseas a long time ago. Short of the couple I could think of, the rest of the jobs remaining that don't require some advanced education don't pay a "living wage".

      I'd love to see the US have a vocational "track" beginning in high school again. But that also requires we have the jobs for them when they graduate.

      Reply View 4 replies
      • edot 3 days ago

        If you've ever worked at a random Fortune 500 company and looked around the office at people whose pinned apps are "Outlook, Powerpoint, Excel", those are jobs that can easily be done if you're moderately smart and learn a few things on the job. You have a reasonably well-defined set of goals, projects, and meetings, and you just have to talk to other people and move numbers around in Excel, then put them into Powerpoint and set up meetings in Outlook to discuss. There are millions of these jobs, and you can get extremely senior once you just learn the business of your company (which would never be taught in college). You don't need a college degree for these. A friend of mine is a senior executive at a large insurance company and does just fine at their job with no degree. Given, they got into that job decades ago when degrees weren't required, and worked their way up, but the same could be done now if employers let people be hired based not on degree but on an apprenticeship or similar trial period.

        Reply View 1 reply
        • anon291 2 days ago

          Employers would let people be hired but any sort of employer based assessment opens the company up to accusations of discrimination. This was litigated. Many companies got in trouble decades ago. And then all companies turned to college degrees and the American consumer was fleeced for good

          Reply View 0 replies
      • csa 3 days ago

        > Construction, a few trades… Help me, I've run out of ideas without resorting to "Walmart Greeter".

        I don’t think you’re trying hard enough.

        - bookkeeper

        - billing (esp. medical)

        - data entry

        - admin assistant

        - inventory management

        - basic tax filing

        - content manager (for websites and social media)

        - scheduling

        - basic account management

        - tons of stuff in supply chain

        I could go on…

        Reply View 0 replies
      • anon291 2 days ago

        Most office work. Finance. Insurance. Mortgage sales. Blue collar jobs. Inspection and compliance. Program management, project management, graphics design, marketing. A lot of software work that doesn't require proof based mathematics (most of it). Your lack of lateral thinking is not an argument.

        Unless my kid was interested in a professorship or the hard sciences or a hard science aspect of engineering work or a specific certificate (architect), I would not encourage college. Seems like a waste of money making years. It can make sense if you're a first generation college person and you were not raised well off, but most people here are in the upper income brackets, so adopting the culture of the upper class is not really something they'd need to do

        Reply View 0 replies
  • Aeolun 4 days ago

    Make money not a consideration in applying for college? Not by handing out whatever the universities are asking for of course, but by giving them a fixed $X per student.

    Reply View 2 replies
    • drivingmenuts 4 days ago

      That might have worked if we had established that right after WWII, but it would never get off the ground now. The current system is too entrenched.

      Reply View 1 reply
      • Aeolun 3 days ago

        You have a president that’s willing to wage war on institutions of higher learning. If anything this is the only time it’s even been remotely possible.

        Reply View 0 replies
  • baiwl 3 days ago

    You have better employment options only if there are not enough people with degrees. If you give everybody the option of obtaining a degree then nobody is better off. In fact those at the bottom of the barrel end up in an even worse position.

    Reply View 1 reply
    • JKCalhoun 3 days ago

      That assumes there are a large number of jobs that require no advanced education. Short of construction, those jobs flew overseas decades ago.

      Reply View 0 replies
AnimalMuppet 4 days ago

The difference is that printing money creates more money, but doesn't create any more stuff. College degrees (theoretically) create more educated people. If you just "hand out" degrees, that doesn't happen, but if you actually teach people, then it does.

Reply View 10 replies
  • linguae 4 days ago

    I agree with you.

    The problem is that many young Americans for the past 30+ years has been told that a bachelor’s degree is the prerequisite for a job that pays well enough to afford a middle class lifestyle, which I’ll define as being able to afford owning a home in a safe neighborhood and being able to provide for a household without living paycheck-to-paycheck.

    What happens when a large number of college graduates enter a tough hiring market while they have five- (or even six-) figure student loan balances? It’s one thing to work at McDonald’s debt-free with a high school diploma; it’s another thing to end up at McDonald’s with tens of thousands of dollars in debt with a bachelor’s degree.

    Of course, there’s more to going to college than career prospects, and there’s also the reality that no one is owed a job. Still, given the amount of adults struggling with paying off their student loans, it’s no wonder more people are reevaluating the economic value of going to college.

    Reply View 6 replies
    • pixl97 4 days ago

      All this states is expensive degrees aren't worth it, not paid for education.

      Reply View 0 replies
    • OGEnthusiast 4 days ago

      > The problem is that many young Americans for the past 30+ years has been told that a bachelor’s degree is the prerequisite for a job that pays well enough to afford a middle class lifestyle, which I’ll define as being able to afford owning a home in a safe neighborhood and being able to provide for a household without living paycheck-to-paycheck.

      Told by who?

      Reply View 4 replies
      • anonymouskimmer 3 days ago

        My anecdote isn't quite the same, but it's along the lines of many adults, not just one's parents: While in high school I constantly got the message on how important it was to stay in school and graduate with a high school diploma. Ironically I passed up the chance to have an associate's degree before my 18th birthday, because I absorbed this message so well that I prioritized high school graduation over the A.S.. It was years later (round about the time I finally finished that A.S. at the age of 29) that I realized the message hadn't been meant for me, but for the students who were at risk of dropping out of high school.

        Reply View 0 replies
      • tolerance 4 days ago

        Well for starters, perhaps the older homeowners who live in safe neighborhoods and provide for [young Americans] without living paycheck-to-paycheck.

        Their parents.

        Reply View 2 replies
  • anon291 3 days ago

    Educated people are the way they are due to a particular personality that they have. They are curious and self driven. Many educated people have no formal education. You cannot teach a personality.

    That's not to say other personalities are less worthwhile... It's just that we have emphasized one kind of personality as the ultimate one and then are surprised that -- after maxing out opportunities for those already suited towards that personality -- a saturation point is reached and future effort has marginal gains.

    Reply View 2 replies
    • [removed] 3 days ago
      [deleted]
      Reply View 0 replies
    • anonymouskimmer 3 days ago

      What's wonderful about comprehensive universities is that there's a program that can excite the interest of almost every personality.

      And even if that wasn't the case, education in general actually speaks to a variety of personalities: The self-motivated learner, the self-improver, the intellectual explorer, the goal-oriented achiever, the rules-based structure seeker.

      Reply View 0 replies
venturecruelty 4 days ago

The good news it that you don't need to hand out money or degrees. See, some people have an inordinate, obscene amount of money, and they would be able to lead full, happy, fulfilling lives if some of that money went to help people who have very little. Because if you're making $30,000 per year working at a gas station, and you lose that income, you're basically screwed. But if you make millions of dollars every year, you won't really miss a small portion of that. You'll be just fine.

So you just need to sort of move wealth around such that it is less egregiously unequal. Oh, and states can fund universities like they did a few decades ago. :) Win-win! Poorer people get to participate more freely in society, with more opportunities, and you don't have to print any extra money.

Reply View 0 replies