mewpmewp2 4 days ago

Your time, energy, etc are not nothing. If you think like that, you have already lost and are not making optimal decisions.

  • moleperson 4 days ago

    The way I read this is that there are many "games" in life (applying for schools, jobs, dating, etc) where the odds of "winning" each instance are not in your favor, but you only need to win once to win overall. If you treat every absence of a positive outcome as a failure, then you're inevitably going to lose hope and give up.

    This is in contrast to gambling where you actually do need to win more often than not to win overall.

    • programjames 3 days ago

      Seems like a momumental waste of energy being pushed as "hustling". Applying to college should be cooperative between you and the admissions office: asking, are we a good fit? Applying in the hope they mess up and admit you when they're really better off rejecting you is so antisocial.

      Admissions are sort-of Pareto distributed, so most people admitted were on the edge of being rejected. Since there is a bit of noise in the process, this is why any one individual applying to 10x as many places of a similar tier will be more likely to get into one. But then when everyone does it, no one is more or less likely to get in except those that are actually cooperating with the admissions office. You're burning down the commons for a fleeting bit of warmth. Might I suggest installing a furnace in your house instead?

      • xandrius 3 days ago

        All I can say is that the method works specifically because people like you exist. It kind of defeats the purpose if we try to change your mind about this.

        So, yes, you are absolutely right.

        • programjames 3 days ago

          Lol, yes. If you're a selfish egoist, you probably don't want to convert others to your philosophy.

          I think it's possible to punish people who are taking these selfish actions, and I think universities should. Maybe they should make a secret database where they list the people who applied to their university, and subtract off points for every other university they applied to. Or, recruiting agencies can mark down candidates for every other job they are applying to. I don't think they do, and this isn't the startup I want to make or area I want to devote my life to, it just sucks that people are being rewarded for playing negative-sum games.

      • moleperson 3 days ago

        > Applying in the hope they mess up and admit you when they're really better off rejecting you is so antisocial.

        What? That's not what I'm suggesting at all. I just found the post to be a helpful reminder of how to have a healthy mindset towards some uncertainties in life, but it seems like you took away something completely different.

    • mewpmewp2 2 days ago

      There are plenty of gambling scenarios where a single win can offset thousands of losses.

  • xandrius 4 days ago

    That counter-argument is only valid if you actually had other things to do.

    If the alternative to send to yet another university application is to start a new match of CoD then it wasn't a loss.

    • mewpmewp2 2 days ago

      Interestingly I found my first job through a video game and I never went to uni. I got good at the game (to brag, top 0.1%) and met people in the game who referred me because of the "respect" from being good at that particular game got me. Might seem odd, but a lot of people in the industry played this game and ability to be good at the game did signal something.

      I have never spam applied anywhere, and have hyperfocused on very specific positions, putting a lot of prep effort into what I have considered strong matches.