Comment by kylecazar

Comment by kylecazar 4 days ago

6 replies

Yeah, I showed a really mild deficiency in my work so they just suggested adding a low daily dose for me. I wouldn't expect to have had any side effects.

ltbarcly3 4 days ago

I was very deficient and they gave me 50k UI per day prescription vitamin D3 for 60 days. Sure enough I was high-normal on my next test. 800ui is likely not enough to have any effect unless you consistently take it for years.

  • kylecazar 4 days ago

    That's wild. I've never heard of such a high dose being prescribed daily.

    Yes, I wouldn't expect to notice anything on my dose.

    • seba_dos1 4 days ago

      It was for 60 days. If they continued to take this much indefinitely it would surely cause troubles, but 60 days when starting from deep deficiency is reasonable.

      • Izkata 4 days ago

        Even that sounds extreme. The "Vitamin D Hammer" for people extremely deficient is 50k IU just once, not even for a temporary period.

        • seba_dos1 3 days ago

          It is high, but it's not extreme. 50k IU just once is an equivalent of about 7000 IU daily for a week, which won't really move the needle much if you're seriously deficient (in fact, it's still within what's considered a safe daily dose for healthy people - you can produce more than that from sunlight alone). You can feel free to take your "hammer" weekly, no deficiency required.

          When I took >5000 IU daily for three months, I only raised 25(OH) D level in my blood from 9 to 30 ng/ml, and there's no evidence of toxicity below 150 ng/ml.

          Of course, when dealing with high doses you need to keep your levels in check, as absorption can differ between individuals.

      • ltbarcly3 4 days ago

        I was very very low, googling my level 'risk of rickets' came up!