Comment by keepamovin

Comment by keepamovin 7 days ago

4 replies

We need quantum entanglement based communication. Maybe without full collapse, using weak measurements, like Alice continuously broadcasts a "retrocausal carrier wave" by sequencing planned future post-selection measurements on her entangled qubits, which backward-propagates through time-symmetric quantum evolution to create detectable perturbations in the present states, biasing Bob's qubits away from pure randomness to encode message patterns.

Both parties perform weak measurements on their qubits to extract these subtle signals without collapsing the entanglement, preserving high coherence across the stream. A quantum Maxwell's demon (e.g. many experiments but can be done: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30185956/) then adaptively selects the strongest perturbations from the wave, filters out noise, and feeds them into error correction to reliably decode and amplify the full message.

wizzwizz4 7 days ago

> which backward-propagates through time-symmetric quantum evolution to create detectable perturbations in the present states,

That's not how quantum physics works. You might be misunderstanding delayed-choice. If you do think it works this way, I encourage you to show a mathematical model: that'll make it easier to point out the flaw in your reasoning.

jamiek88 7 days ago

You cannot exchange information with quantum entanglement. It’s impossible.

mrguyorama 5 days ago

This is nonsense word salad.

The paper you link does not demonstrate a Quantum Maxwell's Demon extracting information or energy.

>This proposal is speculative and assumes quantum mechanics is incomplete, incorporating elements from Bohmian mechanics (non-local hidden variables) and CSL (stochastic collapses).

LMAO, you don't get to change the rules to fit your needs. Come on man.

Stop thinking that chatting with LLMs is doing science. You literally just made up fake physics, and claimed that non-existent physics "implies" something.