Comment by carabiner

Comment by carabiner 5 hours ago

16 replies

Fascinating. Also impressive rawness, and it doesn't even seem like she passed it thru Chatgpt. It's insane that my first inclination is to detect those telltale signs in a blog post, and here I found none.

stavros 3 hours ago

Nobody who likes writing would use ChatGPT to write. First of all, it takes the fun out of it, and second of all, its writing is clinical and corporate. I'm writing to express myself, how would I accomplish that through someone else?

I don't think trying to detect ChatGPT is a good use of time. Either the writing is good, or it's not.

plasticeagle 4 hours ago

I feel absolutely confident that Charlie XCX would never use generative AI in any form. And this sentence is lovely;

"...let some random person you’ve just met in the bathroom try on the necklace around your neck that is equivalent to the heart of the ocean"

Like you I always look for signs of AI in writing I see online, and it's incredibly disappointing how often it's there. There's no personality, no charm, nothing unique - just the same flawless grammar and overuse of cliche. This piece is filled with the quality of humanity that we once took for granted. This is what we are losing.

[removed] 3 hours ago
[deleted]
varjag 5 hours ago

Yeah there's a 'delve' there but it almost feels it was put in as a taunt.

  • jspash 3 hours ago

    I never quite understood this “tell”. I use the word all the time. As do a lot of the people I have know. Written and spoken.

    Is this maybe an American thing? Ie it’s just not used much there?

    • levocardia 2 hours ago

      "Delve" was one of the words whose usage spiked most dramatically after the launch of ChatGPT, relative to its usage pre-ChatGPT.

pinkmuffinere 2 hours ago

> and it doesn't even seem like she passed it thru Chatgpt

Oh my god, can we stop with the obsession of whether something has been chatgpt-ified? I like to know when things are true, or when they are good. I couldn't care less if they are chatgpt-y.

gdulli 4 hours ago

She may be of the final generation of real creatives who aren't at a disadvantage relative to those who take the path of least resistance and put out slop. The current/next generation of the audience may look at manually created art as a curiosity, the way most of us think about listening to vinyl.

some_guy_nobel 4 hours ago

[flagged]

  • mrdependable 4 hours ago

    I found it pretty hollow too, but I probably went into it with the wrong expectations. The title of the article sounds promising, and the writing is decent enough that I believe something interesting could be said, but in the end it felt less introspective and more self-indulgent. I'm sure she could write the essay I was hoping to read, but it turned out to be the essay I should have expected instead.

    • strken 4 hours ago

      Weirdly enough, I went in thinking it would be a deep-dive into the actual process and job of being a pop star.

      Presumably she's not just being carted between parties, gigs, and the recording studio - how does she spend her time? Who manages her schedule? When she's putting out an album, is she the one driving the process? How does she (or her manager, label, PA, etc.) find graphic designers, producers, videographers for the ad campaign, contractors to arrange a tour, and PR firms to arrange talk show interviews and press hype? Where does the money go - does she have a family office, does she have an emergency trust fund, how does she protect against fraud and embezzlement, and is she even thinking about that stuff? How does the job of being a pop star work?

      The essay is exactly what I should have expected, and that's fine. Even if someone is writing in an unfiltered way it doesn't mean their stream of consciousness will contain the overly detailed trivia I'm interested in.

    • bitwize 3 hours ago

      Britney Spears always struck me as an idiot, and someone who is unable to think very deeply at all. But I read her testimony, in very unsophisticated language, of how her father treated her with fascination and sympathy.

      I think hearing an authentic voice about what it's like "on the inside" of music industry, being a celebrity, etc. is valuable, even if the speaker doesn't meet the average HNer's standards for intelligence, originality, creativity, or depth.

  • quamserena 4 hours ago

    It clearly hasn’t been passed through a PR team or ChatGPT; if it had been you’d expect them to fix the grammatical errors. It’s an honest stream-of-consciousness blog post almost certainly written by Charli XCX herself and herself alone about her thoughts, and it is honest and unapologetic. What word more describes this than “raw”?

    • paulcole 4 hours ago

      Wouldn’t the best PR team be the one who you couldn’t tell touched it?

      The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn’t exist and all…

  • beepbooptheory 4 hours ago

    What do think could of been added or taken away or changed to make it better? What would a "good" version of this piece of writing be like for you? Is it a matter of voice, pacing, structure? You seem to imply maybe a lack of juicy details I guess?