Comment by JumpCrisscross

Comment by JumpCrisscross 5 hours ago

6 replies

> Uranium is so damn energy dense and abundant enough that there's little need to set up these complicated recycling systems

Uranium is abundant, but not homogenously so [1]. (China has some. But not a lot. And it's bound up expensively. And it's by their population centres.)

For the Americas, Europe, Australia, southern Africa and Eastern Mediterranean, burning uranium makes sense. For China, it trades the Strait of Malacca for dependence on Russia and Central Asia.

[1] https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/Pub1800.pdf

cyberax 5 hours ago

Uranium can be stockpiled for years in advance, relatively easily. Enough to tide over a small war while you're setting up domestic production. And China should have enough low-grade ores for that.

  • JumpCrisscross 4 hours ago

    > Uranium can be stockpiled for years in advance, relatively easily

    So can oil. Energy security is an important priority for a global power.

    Stockpiles are good. Own supply chains are better.

    • Ericson2314 4 hours ago

      Uranium is far, far energy denser than any fossil fuel, and thus much easier to stockpile.

      • JumpCrisscross 2 hours ago

        > Uranium is far, far energy denser than any fossil fuel, and thus much easier to stockpile

        Sure. That doesn't remove stockpiles' inherent disadvantages: finiteness and vulnerability. Relying on uranium stockpiles would immediately put China at a known limit in a war of attrition that wouldn't constrain their adversaries.

  • mc32 4 hours ago

    Also, they can bring it in by rail from Russia. So they can avoid the seaward path.

    • JumpCrisscross 2 hours ago

      > they can bring it in by rail from Russia

      Uranium is better for Chinese energy security than oil. But this still leaves China at Moscow's mercy. That's not too differet, energywise, than the situation is now.