Comment by caseyohara

Comment by caseyohara 10 hours ago

This is where static site generators can be a good option. I’m in the same boat. I don’t have any appetite for self hosting and maintaining some internet-facing application with a web server and a database and a million dependencies in between. So for my personal site, I generate it locally and stick the static files on S3. No database, no servers, no headache.

SoftTalker 8 hours ago

Agree, static HTML seems the only thing that is at all future-proof. Any hosted blog or platform will have the risk of shutting down or abandonment but if your source is HTML you can host that anywhere, with little setup. Even so I'd keep my posts in a text-based precursor format such as Markdown or Org-Mode. I don't think HTML is going away soon but it's not inconceivable.

Reply View 0 replies

simonw 9 hours ago

Yeah, static site generators solve so many of these problems. There's a lot less that can go wrong if your hosting is entirely static files out of S3 or Cloudflare or nginx or similar.

Reply View 1 reply

bostik 9 hours ago

Or as in my case, lighttpd, with all its CGI, user-input processing or dynamic execution modules not even loaded.
Makes for an attack surface that gets delightfully close to zero.

Reply View | 0 replies