Comment by mitchellh

Comment by mitchellh 12 hours ago

4 replies

This is why I use the agent I use. I won't name the company, because I don't want people to think I'm a shill for them (I've already been accused of it before, but I'm just a happy, excited customer). But it's an agentic coding company that isn't associated with any of the big model providers.

I don't want to keep up with all the new model releases. I don't want to read every model card. I don't want to feel pressured to update immediately (if it's better). I don't want to run evals. I don't want to think about when different models are better for different scenarios. I don't want to build obvious/common subagents. I don't want to manage N > 1 billing entities.

I just want to work.

Paying an agentic coding company to do this makes perfect sense for me.

pjm331 9 hours ago

I’ve been surprised at the lack of discussion about sourcegraph’s Amp here which I’m pretty sure you’re referring to - it started a bit rough but these days I find that it’s really good

  • SatvikBeri 6 hours ago

    So, I tried to sign up for Amp. I saw a livestream that mentioned you can sign up for their community Buildcrew on Discord and get $100 of credits. I tried signing up, and got an email that I was accepted and would soon get the credits. The Discord link did not work (it was expired) and the email was a noreply, so I tried emailing Amp support. This was last Friday (8 days ago.) As of today, no updated Discord link, no human response, no credits. If this is their norm, people probably aren't talking about it because they just haven't been able to try it.

    • sqs 4 hours ago

      Sorry we missed that email! I don’t know what went wrong there, but I just replied and will figure it out. This is definitely not the norm (and Build Crew is a small fraction of our users).

      • SatvikBeri 3 hours ago

        (I can't edit my old post, but it turned out to be a Discord issue, not an issue with the amp link. Oops!)