Comment by skybrian

Comment by skybrian a day ago

2 replies

It seems like some of the arguments in favor of doing frequent releases apply at least a little bit for dependency updates?

Doing updates on a regular basis (weekly to monthly) seems like a good idea so you don't forget how to do them and the work doesn't pile up. Also, it's easier to debug a problem when there are fewer changes at once.

But they could be rescheduled depending on what else is going on.

michaelcampbell 11 hours ago

> Doing updates on a regular basis (weekly to monthly)

This lessens, but doesn't eliminate supply side vulns. You can still get a vulnerable new release if your schedule happens to land just after the vuln lands.

TFA proposes a _delay_ in a particular dependency being pulled in. You can still update every day/hour/microsecond if you want, you just don't get the "new" thing until it's baked a bit.