Comment by estebarb

Comment by estebarb 2 hours ago

I think that is completely different. Piracy websites do only one thing. Chatbots are different.

My concern is that where are we going to put the line: If I type a copyrighted song in Word is Microsoft liable? If I upload a lyric to ChatGPT and ask it to analyze or translate it, is it a copyright violation?

I totally understand your line of thinking. However, the one I'm suggesting could be applied as well and it has precedents in law (intellectual authors of crimes are punishable, not only the perpetrators).

dpoloncsak 2 hours ago

> I think that is completely different. Piracy websites do only one thing. Chatbots are different.

Well...YouTube is liable for any copyrighted material on their site, and do 'more than one thing'

Reply View 1 reply

estebarb an hour ago

Not really. Youtube is not liable as long as they remove the content after a copyright complain and other mechanisms.
The problem is if OpenAI is liable for reproducing copyrighted content, so will be other products such as word processors, video editors and so on. So, as society where we will put the line?
Are we going to tolerate some copyright infringement in these tools or are we going to pursue copyright infringements even in other tools as we already got the tools to detect it?
We cannot have double standards, law should be applied equally to everyone.
I do think that overall making OpenAI liable for output is a bad precedent, because of repercusions beyond AI tools. I'm all fine with making them liable for having trained on copyrighted content and so on...

Reply View | 0 replies