Comment by exasperaited

Comment by exasperaited 6 hours ago

AI has no intent or creativity, so it can be neither right nor wrong, neither good nor bad.

So just as there's no procedural difference between an AI getting something right and an AI "hallucinating", if the word "slop" describes anything AI generates, it describes all of it.

Either everything generative AI creates is slop or nothing is. So everything is.

Also I know stealing is not the same thing as copyright infringement. I'm talking about stealing livelihoods as much as stealing art.

SAI_Peregrinus 6 minutes ago

> AI has no intent or creativity, so it can be neither right nor wrong, neither good nor bad.

Values aren't required for something to be good or bad. Outcomes are. A giant meteor strike causing a global firestorm & brief ice age causing mass death is bad, but giant meteors have no values.

Reply View 0 replies

alickz 5 hours ago

>AI has no intent or creativity, so it can be neither right nor wrong, neither good nor bad.

AI is just a wrapper around a tool - it doesn't need intention or creativity because those come from the user in the form of prompts (which are by definition intentional)

It's just a Natural Language Interface for calling CLI tools mostly, just like how GUIs are just graphical interfaces for calling CLI tools, but no one thinks a GUI has no intentionality or creativity even when using stochastic/probabilistic tools

Anything a user can do with an AI they could also do with a GUI, it would just take longer and more practice

>Either everything generative AI creates is slop or nothing is. So everything is.

But then how do you know something is slop before you know if it's made with GenAI? Does all art exist as Schrodinger's Slop until you can prove GenAI was used? (if that's even possible)

Reply View 0 replies