Comment by ebbi

Should have gotten a multi-pass.

Tim Cook'd

1. Why would McKinsey etc be interested in a well-functioning government? Best argument I have is that if the economy grows then government (and private) spending on consulting may grow.

2. Note that the consulting firms already managed to get the legislation they most cared about – creation of the LLP as a kind of entity – despite not having any candidates

3. If the government is too associated with a big consultancy then (a) they may be pressured out of giving them contracts (not good for McKinsey!) and (b) failures by that consultancy will be highlighted more than usual in the news (also not good!)

4. I mean plenty of people would go through the consultancy meat-grinder before becoming politicians. If you are training juniors to think similarly then that may carry over after they leave.

They do. Look at the US Democrats specifically.

This is basically Pete Buttigieg

They all absolutely do. All capitalist parties are heavily funded by industry of some sort.

That was basically Rishi Sunak, but going beyond that voters really hate it when you make the corporate control obvious.

However, they don't ask questions, so one layer of money laundering is completely fine. Nobody asks where the funding for Farage's various projects comes from, for example.

maybe they do?

you just don't hear about which candidates are theirs

That sounds like a nightmare.

"Here is my 300 slide pack to explain why you should vote for me"

Because they can milk either side. Gov needs private partnerships as much as the privates need their money.

Our plan is to install our government under the tyrannical rule of a dictator, then fire that dictator, slowly collapse for a dozen years, and then rehire the dictator. Then we just sit back and let him cook.