anilakar 6 hours ago

That's not what GP said though.

The point was not to make them publicly available but treat them as if they had already leaked and allowed anyone to frame anyone else.

rwmj 4 hours ago

Visit a bus stop, pick up a stubbed out cigarette, leave it at the scene of your next crime.

  • potato3732842 3 hours ago

    You're gonna want somewhere where people are much more likely to have a record and be in the system than a bus stop.

    • rwmj 2 hours ago

      A bus stop in a rough part of town then.

ronsor 9 hours ago

1. Most people already share this data in the form of photos posted online.

2. So people don't treat it as a "secure secret," because we've been down this road more than once before.

  • elisbce 9 hours ago

    That's so stupid. Just because I posted a video on TikTok doesn't mean someone should be able to go to the city's public website, look me up on a yellow page and download my photo id and fingerprints.

    • andreasmetsala 7 hours ago

      That’s not what the poster meant.

      What treating this biometric info as public means is that it won’t be accepted as valid proof of identity. Just because you posted a video on TikTok shouldn’t mean that a scammer can take out a loan in your name.

  • hulitu 7 hours ago

    > 1. Most people already share this data in the form of photos posted online.

    So most people have a red iris. Problem solved. /s