Comment by joomla199
Comment by joomla199 11 hours ago
Given that we don’t know why electromagnetism exists, this is basically true for many technologies.
Comment by joomla199 11 hours ago
Given that we don’t know why electromagnetism exists, this is basically true for many technologies.
This is true, and the fact that humans mostly become blind to this magic past the age of 5 is one of the reasons we live in such a dismal world.
Sure but that's somewhat tautological and not very helpful if you seek an empirical or predictive understanding of it. The question really is what complexity of the system (meaning: all of it) is irreducible and what can at least be approximated with simplified models.
You may balk at this as being ultimately futile but our entire existence is built on trying to break apart and simplify the world we exist in, starting with the first cut between self/inside and other/outside (i.e. "this is me" vs "this is where I am" - a distinction that becomes immensely relevant after the moment of birth). Language itself only functions because we can create categories it can operate on - regardless of whether those categories consistenly map to reality itself.
What do you mean? We know quite well how electromagnetism arises from U(1) symmetry in gauge theory. What else is there to know?