Comment by stevage

Comment by stevage 13 hours ago

3 replies

The first couple of paragraphs of price comparisons are useful. Then there are many paragraphs of sheer waffle. The author doesn't even seem able to define what "the cloud" is:

> The whole debate of “is this still the cloud or not” is nonsense to me. You’re just getting lost in naming conventions. VPS, bare metal, on-prem, colo, who cares what you call it. You need to put your servers somewhere. Sure, have a computer running in your mom’s basement if that makes you feel like you’re exiting the cloud more, I’ll have mine in a datacenter and both will be happy.

charlieflowers 12 hours ago

I read the whole thing and I didn't see any waffle. Sure, undeniably some excess word count, some emotion in responding to critics. But no waffle.

The "is this cloud or not" debate in the piece makes perfect sense. Who cares whether Hetzner is defined as "the cloud" or not? The point is, he left AWS without going to Azure or some other obvious cloud vendor. He took a step towards more hands on management. And he saved a ton of money.

  • kkapelon an hour ago

    > He took a step towards more hands on management. And he saved a ton of money.

    Then the article should be titled as

    "Send this article to your friend who still thinks that AWS is a good idea"

    or

    "Save costs by taking a step towards more hands on management"

    or

    "How I saved money moving from AWS to Hetzner"

kazinator 13 hours ago

The cheap hosting service they switched to is arguably "cloud".

If you can't drive to the location where your stuff is running, and then enter the building blindfolded, yet put your hands on the correct machine, then it's cloud.