Comment by computably
Comment by computably 7 hours ago
1024 bits for a hash is pretty roomy. The embedding "just" has to be well-distributed across enough of the dimensions.
Comment by computably 7 hours ago
1024 bits for a hash is pretty roomy. The embedding "just" has to be well-distributed across enough of the dimensions.
Yeah, that's what I was thinking: Did we think 32 bits across each of the 1024 dimensions would be necessary? Maybe 32768 bits is adding unnecessary precision to what is ~1024 bits of information in the first place.