Comment by wopwops

Comment by wopwops 2 days ago

8 replies

Why do the images look like someone took pictures of dotmatrix printer output?

---

Update: for whatever it's worth, I just asked the Magic 8 Ball (Perplexity):

Low-tech Magazine uses the option to display images as dithered primarily to reduce the energy consumption and data load of their website. Dithering is an old image compression technique that reduces the number of colors in images to just a few shades of gray (black and white with four levels of gray), which dramatically decreases the file size. The black-and-white dithered images are then recolored via the browser’s CSS, which adds no extra data load.

This approach makes images roughly ten times less resource-intensive than full-color high-resolution images, which supports the magazine’s goal of having a low-energy, solar-powered website. However, some images, such as graphs or those with crucial color information, may become less clear under dithering, so the website offers the option to turn off dithering for individual images to reveal the original, heavier images. This balances energy efficiency with the need for clarity when visual information depends on color or detail.

Thus, the dithered image feature is both an energy-saving measure and a distinct stylistic choice that aligns with the philosophy of reducing the environmental impact of web usage while maintaining visual storytelling appeal.

3D30497420 2 days ago

This feels (needlessly) performative. I get the idea, but the low quality images make it harder to understand what they are showing in the photos, which makes it harder to then reproduce their work.

I suppose the vast majority of users will not need the higher resolution, so perhaps have it be a toggle to get the higher-resolution when needed.

  • thenthenthen 2 days ago

    All the comments here underline the un-needlessness of this performative act.

kamranjon 2 days ago

It would seem strange if that was the purpose since the first photo on the website is ~40kb

  • gblargg 2 days ago

    I looked into this and the same photos could be compressed as nice color JPGs of the same size, with a lot more detail. But it would require more computing resources on the viewing end. I think this is their main target, hardware required to decode.

    • kragen 2 days ago

      Not sure, JPEGs were fine in Netscape on my 60 MIPS 5x86-133 29 years ago. Mortification of the flesh to do penance for the sin of humanity tasting the forbidden fruit of knowledge may be their main target.

two_handfuls 2 days ago

There is a button under the image that will show you the color version. As others mentioned, the site's about page explains the rationale.