Comment by roenxi

Comment by roenxi 2 days ago

2 replies

The author didn't consider a more basic selection bias that the 3 contradictory facts are driven by different groups of people. That makes it rather easy to reconcile 3 apparently contradictory views. You can't jump-start a new market for a dating app with in-person speed daters because they are the people who refuse to use an app!

And it is worth being a little suspicious of the people who 'hate' dating apps. There are valid criticisms, but the people who are just bad partners are going to turn up somewhere and it might be that pool of people - they tend not to be big on reflecting on their own flaws with rigorous intellectual honesty and would blame the apps.

Der_Einzige a day ago

Being bad at apps means you are either ugly, or your pictures are bad.

There’s plenty of examples on dating apps of people making fake bios with extremely handsome men described as being evil (I.e child abuseres) and who still had lines of women who wanted to date him.

He had excellent photos and an obvious 6 pack. His pictures looked professional and showed his (large) social group where he was obviously the leader.

I do not blame anyone for not being successful on dating apps because I believe a persons current physical appearance and attractiveness have little to do with their character or suitability as a partner.

  • throwaway2037 a day ago

        > Being bad at apps means you are either ugly, or your pictures are bad.
    
    For the record, I assume you are speaking about men whom are seeking women. The reverse is certainly not true.

        > He had ... an obvious 6 pack.
    
    This is very specific. Did he have shirtless photographs? I assume yes.

    It fascinates me that if you listen to what women say, 95% will say they dislike dating profiles the most when the man has shirtless photographs. Yet, 95% of women will also say that guys with a six pack are hot. It reminds me of the old adage: "Watch what women do, not what they say."