bqmjjx0kac 2 days ago

It would be more plausibly practical if GHC could now target wasm, but this announcement is actually about being able to run the compiler itself in the browser.

  • tempay 2 days ago

    It can target wasm, the point of the post is that it’s now mature enough to be able to build itself for wasm and run in a browser.

  • Jaxan 2 days ago

    This is a show case of the wasm backend

swannodette 2 days ago

Loading 50mb of WASM is a big tradeoff just to run code on a website.

  • extraduder_ire a day ago

    For comparison: the homepage of cnn.com right now is 33.37MB on my machine. 16.82MB of which is JavaScript.

  • tuveson 2 days ago

    Loading time is pretty rough, but it seems responsive enough after the initial load. Probably as fast or faster than downloading and installing GHC locally.

  • wslh 2 days ago

    I would assume that in the near future one can preload, cache, update selected WASM packages. I also imagine that sooner than that we can preload open models in the browser to run the natively instead of only invoking third parties (e.g. window.ai in the DOM)