Comment by neya

Comment by neya 4 days ago

25 replies

In Microsoft's defense, Azure has always been a complete joke. It's extremely developer unfriendly, buggy and overpriced.

michaelt 4 days ago

If you call that defending microsoft, I'd hate to see what attacking them looks like :)

  • dijit 4 days ago

    Not to put too fine a point on it, but if I have a dark passenger in my tech life it is almost entirely caused by what Microsoft wants to inflict on humanity - and more importantly; how successful they are at doing it.

  • amelius 4 days ago

    In commenter's defense, their comment makes no sense.

  • dude250711 4 days ago

    Save it for when they stick Copilot into Azure portal.

    • alias_neo 4 days ago

      Ha, you haven't used it recently have you? Copilot is already there, and it can't do a single useful thing.

      Me: "How do I connect [X] to [Y] using [Z]?"

      Copilot: "Please select the AKS cluster you'd like to delete"

    • nflekkhnnn 4 days ago

      Actually one of the inventors of k8s was the project lead for copilot in the azure portal, and deployed it over a year ago.

sfn42 4 days ago

I've only used Azure, to me it seems fine ish. Some things are rather overcomplicated and it's far from perfect but I assumed the other providers were similarly complicated and imperfect.

Can't say I've experienced many bugs in there either. It definitely is overpriced but I assume they all are?

  • voidfunc 4 days ago

    They are all broken, weird, and expensive in their own ways. Its nothing unique to Azure.

    • [removed] 2 days ago
      [deleted]
  • lokar 4 days ago

    For something fairly small, they are about the same.

    At a large scale, azure is dramatically worse then Aws.

sofixa 4 days ago

> In Microsoft's defense, Azure has always been a complete joke. It's extremely developer unfriendly, buggy and overpriced.

Don't forget extremely insecure. There is a quarterly critical cross-tenant CVE with trivial exploitation for them, and it has been like that for years.

  • hinkley 4 days ago

    Given how much time I spent on my first real multi-tenant project, dealing with the consequences of architecture decisions meant to prevent these sorts of issues, I can see clearly the temptation to avoid dealing with them.

    But what we do when things are easy is not who we are. That's a fiction. It's how we show up when we are in the shit that matters. It's discipline that tells you to voluntarily go into all of the multi-tenant mitigations instead of waiting for your boss to notice and move the goalposts you should have moved on your own.

madjam002 4 days ago

My favourite was the Azure CTO complaining that Git was unintuitive, clunky and difficult to use

  • lawgimenez 4 days ago

    Sounds like he’s describing Windows phone.

    • ac2u 4 days ago

      Feel like I have to defend windows phone here, I liked it! Although I swore off the platform after the hardware I bought wasn’t eligible for the windows phone 8 upgrade even though the hardware was less than two years old. They punished early adopters

      • lawgimenez 4 days ago

        Yeah Windows Phone's first releases were decent. I have developed apps for Windows actually using Window's UWP framework but there weren't enough users on their platform sadly.

  • macintux 4 days ago

    Isn’t it?

    • Hilift 4 days ago

      Ironically, the GitHub Desktop Windows app is quite nice.

    • dspillett 4 days ago

      Yes. But the point is compared to Azure in places the statement was very much the pot commenting on the kettles sooty arse. And git makes no particular pretence to be particularly friendly, just that it does a particular job efficiently.

rk06 3 days ago

Hmm, isn't that the same argument we use in defense of windows and ms teams?