Comment by andy99

Comment by andy99 9 hours ago

4 replies

YMMV, to me there’s nothing I would watch an ad in order to use, given the choice. As in there are things I value enough to pay for, and things I don’t care if they go away. No ad-supported middle ground.

Unfortunately “normies footing the bill” means in many cases we’re stuck with engagement optimized drivel instead of actual thoughtful content, which is largely the point of the original post. I’d love a world where this was driven out of existence because people stopped watching ads.

spudlyo 7 hours ago

I would like to take this even further, I'd like to see what it's like to not consume any intellectual property encumbered media of any sort, so either public domain or CC licensed materials. I can, and do this easily enough with books, but for video it seems impossible. Of course, one could make the argument that would mean I'd be unable to read the comments here on Hacker News, however in practice IP protections on such tiny bits of content are rarely if ever enforced.

In a similar vein, I'd like to be able to block any YouTube content that is sponsored. This seems a lot more possible, since Sponsor Block already maintains this info.

rkomorn 8 hours ago

> No ad-supported middle ground.

So instead of an ad-blocker, you have an extension that detects ads and immediately closes the tab if there are any?

  • econ 4 hours ago

    The link shouldn't really exist. Inline links replaced by text everything else removed.

    You could preload all linked pages and have some API to consult.

  • [removed] 5 hours ago
    [deleted]