Comment by jeswin

Comment by jeswin 17 hours ago

In this review, Hardware Canucks tested [1] the M4 Pro (3nm 2nd gen) and the 395+ (4nm) at 50w and found the performance being somewhat comparable. The differences can be explained away by 3nm vs 4nm.

[1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v7HUud7IvAo

aurareturn 6 hours ago

It isn’t comparable at all. In MT, maybe it is comparable with the M4 Pro still winning. In ST, it is 3-4x ahead of Strix Halo in efficiency.

Reply View 1 reply

kllrnohj 2 hours ago

> In ST, it is 3-4x ahead of Strix Halo in efficiency.
The Hardware Canucks video didn't seem to do any such investigation, where did you get that number from?

Reply View | 0 replies

jamiek88 3 hours ago

How the heck is a 3.6x faster single thread M4 Pro 'comparable'? Which by the way you can buy in a $600 prebuilt not $2500 if you can even find this unobtanium chip.

Reply View 1 reply

kllrnohj 2 hours ago

where are you seeing 3.6x faster single thread performance???

Reply View | 0 replies